Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Repository advisory GHSA-2xp9-vwfh-vxw4 (Next.js, Critical 9.5, published 2026-08-25) not ingested into the Advisory Database

未关闭
#9,324 0 条评论 1 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
38/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
next.js

调研方向

首先查看 repository 的贡献指南,然后核验 issue 中针对 GHSA-2xp9-vwfh-vxw4 列出的 advisory 详细信息和查询结果。未指定源文件、测试或 ingestion 入口,因此首要任务是定位 review 和 import 工作流。完成标准是该 advisory 已存在于全局数据库中,并且所请求的 review 延迟或待处理 advisory 行为已得到明确。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Summary

A Critical repository-level security advisory published on vercel/next.js
on 2026-08-25 is still absent from the global GitHub Advisory Database as of
2026-09-03, nine days later. Because every downstream consumer keys off that
database, the vulnerability is currently invisible to Dependabot, npm audit,
yarn audit, osv-scanner and anything else built on the OSV mirror.

Advisory
  • GHSA ID: GHSA-2xp9-vwfh-vxw4
  • Title: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Image Optimization API when
    AVIF files are used
  • Package: npm next
  • Affected: >= 10.0.0 < 15.5.24 and < 16.3.3
  • Patched: 15.5.24, 16.3.3
  • Severity: Critical, CVSS v4 9.5
    (CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H)
  • CVE: none assigned
  • Upstream reference: GHSA-g89c-p67h-r497 (strukturag/libheif)
Current state
Lookup Result
github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-2xp9-vwfh-vxw4 200, Critical, ranges as above
github.com/advisories/GHSA-2xp9-vwfh-vxw4 404
api.github.com/[email protected] advisory not returned
api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/GHSA-2xp9-vwfh-vxw4 404
Expected behaviour

A published repository advisory in a supported ecosystem (npm) should be
reviewed and ingested into the global Advisory Database, and from there
propagate to the API, the OSV mirror and Dependabot alerts.

Impact

Any team whose vulnerability management relies on the documented tooling —
which is the tooling GitHub itself recommends — got a clean bill of health
for a Critical unauthenticated RCE affecting two major release branches of
one of the most widely deployed npm packages. Verifying it required manually
opening the vendor's own advisory page, which does not scale and is not a
process any automated pipeline can perform.

Requests
  1. Ingest GHSA-2xp9-vwfh-vxw4 into the Advisory Database.
  2. Clarify the expected review latency for repository advisories, and whether
    Critical-severity submissions are prioritised.
  3. Consider exposing an API surface for published-but-not-yet-curated
    repository advisories, so scanners can at least flag them as pending
    rather than reporting zero findings.
主要语言
没有语言数据
星标
2.5k
派生
789
平均合并
6 天 10 小时
30 天内合并 PR
61

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

github/advisory-database 的其他 Issue

查看 github/advisory-database 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Databases Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。