Stop creation of CVSS v4 by yourself
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 20/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 领域
- security
调研方向
首先查看 advisory-database#5032 中的原始讨论和列出的 CVE 示例,然后追踪 CVSS v4 值和严重性是在何处生成的。将生成的值与原始 CVSS 数据以及文档中记录的 advisory 行为进行比较。完成后应能防止计算出的分数和严重性值不正确,并记录 policy 和计算过程。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
You seem to to create CVSS v4 scores for some advisories as I found out in https://github.com/github/advisory-database/pull/5032.
I condensed the original discussion into this issue.
There are some problem with that, here is a quick recap:
- This is only done for certain CVEs, not all
- The process how these CVSS v4 values are created is not transparent
- There is no (public) documentation that this is done, how this is done and why it is done
- Likely no communication with CVE creators / CVSSv4 values do not match CVE descriptions (usually only contains CVSS v3 score explanation)
- Created CVSS v4 are not marked as "computed from CVSSv3 by GitHub" or something similar anywhere
- Original CVSS score is not used for computing the
severity
Please have a look at the original discussion for more details.
Anyway this process seems to result in incorrect scores (some values do not match at all) and incorrect severity values, thus also resulting in False Postives and Negatives in downstream scanners that utilize the database with severity filters.
Spontaneously found examples:
| CVE | CVSS v3 (original) | CVSS v4 created by GitHub (used in severity) |
Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5 moderate | 7.0 High | See https://github.com/github/advisory-database/pull/5032 | |
| CVE-2024-53848 | 7.1 High | 6.1 Moderate | Vulnerable System Impact Metrics seem to be missing |
| CVE-2024-52806 | 8.3 High | 6.9 Medium | Vulnerable System Impact Metrics seem to be missing |
| CVE-2024-51132 | 9.8 Critical | 8.8 High | Subsequent System Impact Metrics seem to be missing |
| CVE-2024-43499 | 7.5 High | 0.0 Low | CVSSv3 is not present in database but was declared in CVE? Not sure what's going on here... |
| CVE-2024-50379 | 9.8 Critical | 7.2 High | Subsequent System Impact Metrics seem to be missing |
The overall current situation erodes (my) trust in this - security critical - system as distinguishing between correct and incorrect scores is no longer easily possible.
Further references:
- 主要语言
- 没有语言数据
- 星标
- 2.5k
- 派生
- 772
- 平均合并
- 3 天 15 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 46
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
github/advisory-database 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 个 reaction ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 条评论 · 1 个 reaction ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
查看 github/advisory-database 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
ElementsProject/cln-application#167 · 1 条评论 · 1 个 reaction ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
confident-ai/deepteam#289 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
VirusTotal/yara-x#780 ·