Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[Question] Are composite types defined in PostgreSQL supported by SQLProvider?

未关闭
#427 12 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
fsharp, postgresql
领域
databases

调研方向

从 PostgreSQLTests.fsx 开始,跟踪 SQLProvider 如何发现和表示存储过程参数。将报告的复合类型签名与现有的 PostgreSQL 类型示例和 Npgsql workaround 进行比较。完成的标准是确定是否支持复合类型,并记录或测试所需的映射或限制。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

enhancement postgresql
Description

Database has composite types defined which are input/output types to stored procedures. I am attempting to call the said procedure with input parameters. SqlProvider does not see the input parameter and assumes it is a void function.

Repro steps

The composite type defined in the database is

CREATE TYPE product_t AS
   (name text,
    product_type text)

The signature of procedure in the database is

create or replace function func_iproduct( p product_t ) returns void as

On .NET side (F#), I have created a type

type PgProductType(Name:string,ProductType:string)=
  member this.Name = Name 
  member this.ProductType = ProductType
  new() = PgProductType("","")

I believe there should be a way in which I could tell SqlProvider how to map PgProductType to product_t; not sure if this is required or such mapping is automatic. If required, an example how do I go about doing it would be helpful. Without this mapping, if I attempt to execute the procedure, the error message it reports back indicates that SqlProvider does NOT see the input parameter;

let prd = new PgProductType("F#Product","")
ctx.Functions.FuncIproduct.Invoke(prd)

stdin(29,1): error FS0501: The member or object constructor 'Invoke' takes 0 argument(s) but is here given 1. The required signature is 'SqlDataProvider<...>.dataContext.Functions.FuncIproduct.Result.Invoke() : Unit'.

Question

  1. Can I use postgresql composite types? If so, an illustrative example would help.The test suite PostgreSQLTests.fsx does not contain an example to map custom types (though there are examples to map pre-defined postgresql types).
  2. Any alternative solution short of re-implementing queries (using query expressions) foregoing the existing procedures?
Known workarounds

Directly use Npgsql

Related information
  • PostgreSQL 9.6
  • Win 7
主要语言
F#
星标
627
派生
147
平均合并
2 小时 2 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
1

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

fsprojects/SQLProvider 的其他 Issue

查看 fsprojects/SQLProvider 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Databases Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。