JVM backend continues after dynamic Test::More skip_all
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 68/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 领域
- backend, testing-qa
调研方向
Start with the minimal reproducer and the JVM backend's Test::More/Test2 skip-all path, then compare it with the interpreter backend. Use t/live_prerelease.t as the real-world case and add the suggested permanent unit test for a dynamically evaluated skip_all followed by a failing statement. Done means both backends exit successfully while preserving the skip TAP output.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Summary
The JVM backend does not terminate successfully after Test::More receives a
dynamic skip_all plan. It prints the skip plan but continues executing the
rest of the test file. The interpreter backend and standard Perl terminate
successfully.
CPAN evidence
- Distribution:
Net::Google::Storage0.2.0 - CPAN run:
20260921-124328-13959 - Failing test:
t/live_prerelease.t - Passing test:
t/basic.t - System Perl focused result: pass;
t/basic.tpasses and
t/live_prerelease.tis skipped becauseTest::Classis unavailable. - The live test also requires optional Google Storage credentials/configuration
and is not part of the local functional test.
The archived JVM result was:
Can't locate object method "runtests" via package "Test::Class"
at t/live_prerelease.t line 10.
t/live_prerelease.t ...... skipped: Probable missing Test::Class
Result: FAIL
The test contains this optional-dependency guard:
BEGIN {
use lib 't/lib';
eval { require Net::Google::Storage::Test; };
if ($@) {
eval "use Test::More skip_all => 'Probable missing Test::Class';";
}
}
Test::Class->runtests;
The upstream test is fragile because the method call is unconditional, but
standard Perl's skip_all behavior makes the file exit successfully before
that call.
Minimal reproducer
eval { require Test::Class::DefinitelyMissing };
if ($@) {
eval q{use Test::More skip_all => "missing optional dependency"};
}
Test::Class->runtests;
Observed results:
| Runtime | Result |
|---|---|
| System Perl | 1..0 # SKIP ..., exit 0 |
| PerlOnJava JVM backend | 1..0 # SKIP ..., then missing-method error, exit 255 |
| PerlOnJava interpreter backend | 1..0 # SKIP ..., exit 0 |
The JVM backend also prints AFTER-SKIP for a variant that prints after the
skip_all call, proving that execution continues after the skip plan. The
interpreter backend does not print it.
Expected behavior
The JVM backend should treat a skip_all plan as successful test termination,
including when Test::More is loaded dynamically inside eval STRING. Code
following the skip plan must not execute, and the process should exit 0.
Suggested acceptance coverage
Add a permanent unit test covering a dynamically evaluated
Test::More skip_all followed by an otherwise-failing statement. Require
successful exit on both the JVM and interpreter backends, while preserving the
skip TAP output.
Likely ownership
This appears to be a JVM-backend control-flow/exit propagation issue in the
Test::More/Test2 skip-all path, not a Net::Google::Storage API or module
implementation issue.
- 主要语言
- Perl
- 星标
- 64
- 派生
- 6
- 平均合并
- 5 小时 38 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 170
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
fglock/PerlOnJava 的其他 Issue
-
area:cpan-port area:unicode bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
fglock/PerlOnJava#1341 ·
-
area:backend area:runtime bug
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
fglock/PerlOnJava#1511 ·
-
area:backend area:cpan-port bug
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
fglock/PerlOnJava#1508 · 1 条评论 ·
-
area:cpan-port area:platform enhancement
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 30/100
fglock/PerlOnJava#1507 ·
-
bug
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
fglock/PerlOnJava#1506 ·
查看 fglock/PerlOnJava 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
documentation Needs Triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
trizen/youtube-viewer#456 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
connectivity 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 80/100
-
Common US ingredient names are not recognized, so about 12.4k US products miss an allergen warning 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
openfoodfacts/openfoodfacts-server#14657 · 4 条评论 ·