feat: sender-constrained tokens with DPoP (RFC 9449)

未关闭
#512 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
typescript

调研方向

Start by reading RFC 9449 and the project plan in #392 to understand the intended DPoP support. Then locate the token endpoint and its client policy and token issuance paths; the issue names no files or tests. Done means refresh tokens are bound to the presenting key, required clients are refused without a proof, and server nonces limit proof replay.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

P2 secure v2.1

Why

A refresh token held by a desktop, mobile or single-page app is a bearer credential: anyone who copies it can use it. Rotation with reuse detection limits the damage after the fact. Sender-constrained tokens prevent it, because a token is only usable with a private key the client holds, ideally one that cannot leave the device (a TPM, Secure Enclave or platform keystore). RFC 9700 recommends sender constraint for public clients' refresh tokens, and #392 lists DPoP for v2.1 without a ticket yet.

What

  • DPoP (RFC 9449) at the token endpoint: a client presents a DPoP proof, and the access and refresh tokens are bound to its key (cnf.jkt).
  • Per-client policy: DPoP optional, or required (for example, required for every public client).
  • Server nonces (DPoP-Nonce) to limit proof replay.
  • Resource servers and adapters verify the proof and the binding (tracked in the adapter repos).
  • Notes for clients on holding the key in hardware where the platform allows it: a TPM on Windows and Linux, the Secure Enclave on macOS and iOS, StrongBox on Android.

Done when

A refresh token issued to a DPoP client cannot be used without a proof from the same key, and a client with DPoP required is refused without one.

主要语言
TypeScript
星标
2
派生
2
平均合并
11 小时 40 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
104

环境准备

  • 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

fells-code/seamless-auth-api 的其他 Issue

查看 fells-code/seamless-auth-api 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。