Clarify Completeness of Requirements Decomposition
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
调研方向
Start by reading the process description sections on Feature Requirements, Component Requirements, traceability, and Feature Integration Tests to understand what assurance the current process already defines. Then identify whether the existing activities and reviews establish complete decomposition while preserving intent. Done means the process team clarifies what is sufficient and documents any additional expectations needed, without prescribing unnecessary overhead.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Context
Feature Requirements are decomposed into Component Requirements. While traceability establishes the relationships between requirements, it does not necessarily demonstrate that the lower-level requirements collectively cover the original requirement completely.
Feature Integration Tests do not necessarily close this gap, as they typically focus on feature-level behavior rather than verifying every detail of the original requirements. Therefore, successful Feature Integration Tests cannot be relied upon to establish the completeness of requirements decomposition.
Open Question
How do we ensure that the decomposition of higher-level requirements into lower-level requirements is complete, without losing or unintentionally changing the original intent?
Is this already sufficiently addressed by our existing process, or do we need additional expectations regarding completeness?
Request to the Process Team
Please evaluate and clarify:
- Whether and how completeness of requirements decomposition needs to be addressed in our process.
- Whether existing activities and reviews already provide sufficient assurance.
- If additional expectations are necessary, what exactly needs to be established, documented, or reviewed.
The intention is not to prescribe a particular solution or introduce additional process overhead by default, but to clarify what is actually necessary and ensure our process addresses it appropriately.
- 主要语言
- HTML
- 星标
- 6
- 派生
- 25
- 平均合并
- 14 小时 47 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 35
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
eclipse-score/process_description 的其他 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
eclipse-score/process_description#811 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Your Bug title未关闭bug
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
eclipse-score/process_description#863 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 52/100
eclipse-score/process_description#862 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Unify proper reference to standards可能已有人在做 @pahmann 于 5 天前认领。 未关闭
eclipse-score/process_description#861 · 已指派 1 人 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Tool Mgt ML3未关闭
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 12/100
eclipse-score/process_description#858 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 eclipse-score/process_description 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 66/100
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
stephrobert/dsoxlab#349 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 84/100
objective-see/LuLu#950 ·
-
קישור שבור未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 63/100
nightscout/AndroidAPS#5529 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 69/100
UniprJRC/DSwithMATLAB#232 ·