[docs-scanner] Contradictory SSO requirements: AI Governance vs Business subscription

阅读 content/manuals/accounts/organization/manage/manage-licenses.md 和 content/manuals/security/authentication/_index.md，然后核实 SSO、SCIM 和 JIT 的权威订阅要求。通过文档或向 Product Owner 确认哪种措辞是正确的。完成标准是两个页面都一致地说明所需层级以及 AI Governance 配置的范围。

File: content/manuals/accounts/organization/manage/manage-licenses.md

Issue

The documentation contradicts itself about SSO and provisioning requirements. In manage-licenses.md, it states:

AI Governance licenses include single sign-on (SSO) and provisioning features regardless of your Docker Core subscription. Automatic license assignment requires setting up SSO, then provisioning with System for Cross-domain Identity Management (SCIM) or Just-in-Time (JIT).

However, in content/manuals/security/authentication/_index.md, it clearly states:

SSO requires a Docker Business subscription.

Why this matters

Readers trying to understand whether they can use SSO with AI Governance licenses alone (without a Business subscription) will get conflicting information. This affects purchasing decisions and setup expectations. If AI Governance truly provides SSO capabilities without Business, that's a significant feature that contradicts the general authentication documentation. If it doesn't, the manage-licenses.md text is misleading.

Suggested fix

Clarify the relationship between AI Governance licenses and SSO/provisioning features. Either:

1. If AI Governance does provide SSO without Business: Update the authentication documentation to note this exception and explain the scope/limitations
2. If AI Governance requires Business for SSO: Remove or rephrase the claim in manage-licenses.md to clarify that SSO setup (which requires Business) is a prerequisite for automatic license assignment, not a feature included with AI Governance

The text should make clear what subscription tier is actually required for SSO when using AI Governance.

Found by nightly documentation quality scanner