Bug when merging when TCP and UDP on the same published port
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
首先使用 compose.yaml 和 compose.override.yaml 重现问题,然后按两种合并顺序运行 docker stack config。跟踪 Docker CLI 对 Compose 文件中 service 端口的合并处理,包括短语法和长语法。当 override 未定义 ports 时,合并后的输出仍保留已发布端口 443 的 TCP 和 UDP 条目,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Description
When merging multiple stack Compose files where one defines a service exposing TCP and UDP on the same published port (e.g., 443), the resulting merged configuration silently drops the first port entry. Even if the override doesn't specify ports. The only work-around I've found is to change the merge order but that's only a viable solution if you're not relying on overriding other values.
This violates the expected behavior where the ports array should remain unchanged if not explicitly overridden.
Reproduce
Given the following files:
# compose.yaml
services:
web:
image: caddy
ports:
- "80:80"
- "443:443" # adding /tcp here makes no difference
- "443:443/udp"
# compose.override.yaml
services:
web:
environment:
FOO: bar
Running the following command:
docker stack config -c compose.yaml -c compose.override.yaml
Returns the following:
version: "3.13"
services:
web:
environment:
FOO: bar
image: caddy
ports:
- mode: ingress
target: 80
published: 80
protocol: tcp
- mode: ingress
target: 443
published: 443
protocol: udp
Note that the 443 tcp entry is now gone.
The same is true when using long syntax.
Reversing the merge order leaves the ports array intact:
docker stack config -c compose.override.yaml -c compose.yaml
Returns the following:
version: "3.13"
services:
web:
environment:
FOO: bar
image: caddy
ports:
- mode: ingress
target: 80
published: 80
protocol: tcp
- mode: ingress
target: 443
published: 443
protocol: tcp
- mode: ingress
target: 443
published: 443
protocol: udp
I've found that merging on a service that uses the same port for both tcp and udp only work as expected if the ports array is only defined in the last file.
Expected behavior
I expect the resulting ports array to be the same (untouched) in the examples above.
docker version
Client: Docker Engine - Community
Version: 28.0.0
API version: 1.48
Go version: go1.24.0
Git commit: f9ced58158
Built: Wed Feb 19 22:05:47 2025
OS/Arch: darwin/arm64
Context: desktop-linux
Server: Docker Desktop 4.43.2 (199162)
Engine:
Version: 28.3.2
API version: 1.51 (minimum version 1.24)
Go version: go1.24.5
Git commit: e77ff99
Built: Wed Jul 9 16:13:56 2025
OS/Arch: linux/arm64
Experimental: true
containerd:
Version: 1.7.27
GitCommit: 05044ec0a9a75232cad458027ca83437aae3f4da
runc:
Version: 1.2.5
GitCommit: v1.2.5-0-g59923ef
docker-init:
Version: 0.19.0
GitCommit: de40ad0
docker info
Client: Docker Engine - Community
Version: 28.0.0
Context: desktop-linux
Debug Mode: false
Additional Info
No response
- 主要语言
- Go
- 星标
- 6.1k
- 派生
- 2.2k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 10 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 47
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
docker/cli 的其他 Issue
-
kind/bug status/0-triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
kind/bug status/0-triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
-
kind/feature status/0-triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
kind/bug status/0-triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
相似的 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 60/100
github/gh-aw-mcpg#13748 ·
-
agentic-workflows
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
-
needs-triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
googleapis/librarian#7670 · 2 条评论 ·