Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Rename the table tiers to a consistent axis — `dj.Entry`, `dj.Ingest`, `dj.Compute` (keep `Manual`/`Imported`/`Computed` as permanent aliases)

未关闭
#1,546 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
52/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python, sql

调研方向

首先定位 tier 类定义以及 issue 中提到的所有路径:SQL tier 前缀、dj.config/Role、lookup_class_name、tier 检测、repr/内省、错误消息和 dj.Diagram 标签。当 Entry/Ingest/Compute 可用,且其行为和前缀与永久别名 Manual/Imported/Computed 完全相同,并且 2.4.0 所要求的规范标签得到处理时,工作即告完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Full tier rename proposed in datajoint/datajoint-docs#267. Filing the class-name change here; the naming decision itself is settled and is not re-opened by this issue.

Why

The populated tiers sit on inconsistent axes: Manual names the writer, Imported names the origin, Computed names the result. A reader reasoning from the names alone lands in the wrong tier — the classic failure being an Imported table with no make() and a permanent allow_direct_insert=True papering over a real modeling error. Putting every populated tier on one axis — what the table does to get its rows — and naming it with that verb removes the confusion.

The rename

Today New primary name The table's rows…
dj.Manual dj.Entry enter the pipeline from outside (a person, an instrument, an ingestion script) — inserted directly, no make()
dj.Imported dj.Ingest are produced by make() that reads an external source
dj.Computed dj.Compute are produced by make() that derives from other DataJoint tables

dj.Lookup and dj.Part are unchanged.

Compatibility

  • dj.Manual, dj.Imported, and dj.Computed remain permanently as backward-compatible aliases — no deprecation, no migration. Existing pipelines, tutorials, and stored tier prefixes keep working; new material teaches the new names.
  • Verify the SQL tier prefix, dj.config/Role, lookup_class_name, and every tier-detection path treat each alias identically to its new name (same prefix, same reserved status) so the aliases are fully transparent on existing schemas.

Why Compute, not Derive

Derive collides with an entrenched database meaning: a derived table / derived relation is the result of a query (a subquery or view), computed on read and not stored — the opposite of a Compute table, whose rows are materialized by make() and persisted with lineage. Database-literate readers would mis-read Derive as "a view." Compute also aligns with how we frame DataJoint — a computational database. (Full discussion in datajoint-docs#267.)

Naming-form note

Entry is a noun; Ingest/Compute are verbs. Python class names read as nouns (class TuningCurve(dj.Compute):), so the verb tiers carry a short adoption cost — an ergonomics tradeoff, not a correctness objection (raised by @gtouloumes in #267). Worth reinforcing the new names consistently across the docs when adopted.

Rollout (2.3.4 → 2.4.0)

Additive and backward-compatible throughout — no deprecation at any point.

  • 2.3.4 — add the names (non-breaking). Introduce dj.Entry, dj.Ingest, and dj.Compute as aliases resolving to the existing tiers, so old and new names produce identical tables (same SQL prefix, same Role). No change to defaults, repr, or what the docs teach yet. Early adopters and new examples can use the names immediately with zero migration. Land the alias-transparency checks (prefix / Role / lookup_class_name / tier detection) in this release.
  • 2.4.0 — make them canonical. Promote the new names to primary: repr/introspection, error messages, and dj.Diagram tier labels emit Entry/Ingest/Compute; the docs and tutorials teach them by default (with the datajoint-docs#267 axis explanation and a terminology sweep shipping alongside). dj.Manual/dj.Imported/dj.Computed remain permanent aliases — kept indefinitely, never deprecated.

Related

  • datajoint/datajoint-docs#267 — the tier-axis explanation (docs) and origin of this proposal.
主要语言
Python
星标
197
派生
98
平均合并
6 天 7 小时
30 天内合并 PR
1

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

datajoint/datajoint-python 的其他 Issue

查看 datajoint/datajoint-python 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。