Feature Request: Adopt Immutable Releases for Improved Supply Chain Security
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
调研方向
未指定文件、测试或入口点。首先阅读 GitHub 关于不可变 release 的指导,并检查 repository 当前的 release 和 distribution 配置。完成标准是定义并采用约定的不可变或仅追加 release 流程,并记录所有已选择的 signing、checksum、provenance 或 SBOM 要求。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Hi Databricks Setup CLI maintainers 👋
I’d like to request that this repository consider adopting immutable releases as part of its release and distribution strategy, in line with GitHub’s supply chain security best practices.
GitHub documents immutable releases here:
👉 https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/supply-chain-security/immutable-releases
Why this matters
At the moment, releases (or release assets) can technically be modified or replaced after publication. While this may be convenient operationally, it introduces avoidable supply chain risk, especially for a security‑sensitive tool like setup-cli that is commonly used in automation, CI/CD pipelines, and privileged environments.
Immutable releases provide the following security and operational benefits:
-
Protection against release tampering
Ensures binaries and artifacts cannot be altered post‑release, intentionally or accidentally. -
Stronger auditability and provenance
Consumers can trust that a given version tag always maps to the same bits. -
Improved defense against supply‑chain attacks
Aligns with modern best practices for secure software distribution. -
Safer CI/CD consumption
Downstream pipelines relying on release versions gain stronger guarantees.
Suggested approach
Some possible ways to implement this (one or more):
- Publish releases as immutable GitHub releases, avoiding asset replacement or retagging
- Treat releases as append‑only (new version instead of modifying an existing one)
- Optionally combine with:
- Signed release artifacts
- Checksums (SHA256/SHA512)
- Provenance metadata or SBOMs
Context
GitHub explicitly recommends immutable releases as a baseline supply chain security control, particularly for CLI tools and automation dependencies:
https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/supply-chain-security/immutable-releases
Adopting this would further strengthen the security posture of databricks/setup-cli and increase confidence for enterprise users.
Happy to help discuss or validate an approach if this is something the team is open to exploring. Thanks for considering!
- 主要语言
- Shell
- 星标
- 29
- 派生
- 19
- 平均合并
- 3 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 6
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
databricks/setup-cli 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
databricks/setup-cli#246 ·
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
databricks/setup-cli#222 · 4 个 reaction ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 48/100
databricks/setup-cli#207 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 48/100
databricks/setup-cli#182 · 1 条评论 · 4 个 reaction ·
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 38/100
databricks/setup-cli#178 ·
查看 databricks/setup-cli 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
bug easy help wanted
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
lacs-project/sysknife#503 ·
-
help wanted kind/documentation
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
liquidmetal-dev/flintlock#1239 ·