Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

RFC: Reorganize Lua scripts folders

未关闭
#639 9 条评论 1 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
重构
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
lua
领域
tooling

调研方向

检查当前的 contrib、data、examples、lib、official 和 tools 文件夹,以及 group_persistence.lua 和提议的 services 文件夹。首先根据 RFC 及其后续讨论确定一套达成共识的目标组织结构。当文件夹布局和归属边界确定,并且可以在不破坏脚本所述用途的情况下重新组织脚本时,即视为完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

The Lua scripts are currently organized into the following folders

  • contrib - user contributed scripts maintained by the submitter (supposedly)
  • data - used to contain assets required by the scripts
  • examples - example scripts
  • lib - libraries with common code used by all scripts and maintained by the darktable team
  • official - scripts contributed and maintained by the darktable team
  • tools - scripts that make the scripts run and odds and ends - maintained by the darktable team

Lately we've started developing/adding scripts that provide a service such as group_persistence.lua which is designed to add tags to grouped images so that the groups are maintained across database instances and can be reconstructed on import.

The scripts aren't meant to be interacted with, though in some instances they can be through shortcuts.

I propose adding a services folder for these scripts, since that's the purpose of them (providing a service).

Thoughts?


As I started I decided why not fix the whole thing. Below is a tree view of my thinking...

主要语言
Lua
星标
219
派生
142
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

darktable-org/lua-scripts 的其他 Issue

查看 darktable-org/lua-scripts 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Lua Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。