Positioning: add a "Why CWA / compared with…" page, including when not to choose it
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 66/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- markdown, yaml
调研方向
Start by reading the home-page content and its navigation to find where the comparison page should be linked; the issue proposes content/compare.yml or an About section. Verify each comparison claim against the cited sources and the project’s own documentation, then include the requested rows and “when not to choose CWA.” Done when the comparison is balanced, sourced, and reachable from the home page.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
From the 2026-10-08 positioning review (market research with sources).
Evaluators compare options, and the site gives them nothing to compare against. Add content/compare.yml (or a section of About), linked from the home page, with an honest table: CWA vs Storyblok, Payload, Strapi, Sulu, Nuxt Studio, Statamic/Craft.
Rows:
- in-page visual editing
- draft/publish and scheduling
- self-hosted
- licence and cost
- front-end framework
- back-end language
- real-time updates
- production stack included
- maturity
Include "when not to choose CWA": you want a single JS stack, you need a stable release now, or you have no PHP skills. Don't frame it as "like WordPress".
Evidence gathered:
- Storyblok's visual editor is SaaS, at $99–$349/mo plus custom tiers (factsheet), and its Nuxt integration is a
v-editablebridge to a hosted editor. - Strapi's Community Edition has static preview only; Live Preview needs Growth or Enterprise (strapi.io).
- Payload is MIT, but its visual editing is dev-led preview. It is Next.js-only and now Figma-owned.
- Nuxt Studio is free and MIT, but Git/file based, with no draft/publish statuses or revision history (InfoQ).
- Sulu, the Symfony incumbent, offers React helpers only, with no Vue/Nuxt path (sulu.io). That is CWA's clearest niche.
- Directus is source-available, with a commercial licence above $5M revenue.
- Statamic publishes its own comparison pages (statamic.com/vs/craft), so there's precedent.
Differentiators to lead with:
- page-level in-place visual editing that is MIT and self-hosted;
- brand guard-rails (allowed components per group, preset styles);
- a complete production stack: tag-purged HTTP cache, Cloudflare edge purges, Mercure real-time updates, scheduled publishing, Helm/Kubernetes, GitLab and GitHub CI.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 0
- 派生
- 0
- 平均合并
- 1 小时 20 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 1
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南，环境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
components-web-app/docs 的其他 Issue
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 40/100
components-web-app/docs#314 · 1 条评论 ·
-
documentation
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
components-web-app/docs#290 · 2 条评论 ·
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
components-web-app/docs#289 · 2 条评论 ·
-
enhancement
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 15/100
components-web-app/docs#237 · 2 条评论 ·
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
components-web-app/docs#1 · 3 条评论 ·
查看 components-web-app/docs 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 66/100
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
reproduced
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
anomalyco/opencode#62052 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
strapi/design-system#2084 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复