Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Stuck at Bringing WireGuard up

未关闭
#25 12 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
go
领域
networking

调研方向

该 issue 未指定任何文件、测试或入口点。首先梳理 wush 当前的 WireGuard 服务器和客户端设置,然后评估提议的 rootless 替代方案;完成的标准是确定一致同意的实现范围,并定义一种在所有受支持平台上验证 rootless 运行的方式。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Hello I was thinking of creating a multi platform application on wush (just thinking , I liked magic wormhole but its golang library was a bit rough and I really liked golang and like your project's approach)
On offtopic I was the author to (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38876954) so I have had a keen interest in this space

Since wush uses wireguard and wireguard needs root access , I found that there is this wireguard compliant non root alternative called wiretap (https://github.com/sandialabs/wiretap)which could allow the server to run rootlessly and also wireproxy (https://github.com/pufferffish/wireproxy)
which could connect to clients rootlessly (or maybe wiretap can do that as well)

Anyhow adding this support could be really interesting
I did somewhere hear that tailscale can be configured in a non rootless device as when I was looking at wireproxy and the likes. some people said that something like this could work directly in headscale , so please look into that as well..

I hope that you could look into these matters.

主要语言
Go
星标
1.5k
派生
47
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

我们还没有检查这个项目的环境配置文件。先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

coder/wush 的其他 Issue

查看 coder/wush 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。