Record the object store and server name of a backup in Backup.status.pluginMetadata
维护者通常 1 天内回复
评估
调研方向
Start in internal/cnpgi/instance/types.go at newBackupResultMetadata, then trace how the plugin resolves the ObjectStore and serverName for a backup. Check the existing backup/plugin tests and add coverage for the proposed metadata keys, including the optional endpointURL. Done means Backup.status.pluginMetadata records the backup location and resolved server name without changing existing metadata.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Description
A Backup taken through the plugin doesn't record which ObjectStore and which serverName the backup was written to. When creating a recovery cluster, we have to find that out by other means and write it by hand in the externalClusters entry.
I'd like the plugin to add this information to the backup result metadata, so that it ends up in Backup.status.pluginMetadata.
This is related to #510 and cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pg#7989 (recovery from a plugin Backup object), which I believe need this as a first step.
Our use case
Our clusters archive under a timestamped serverName (for example mydb-20261003T120000), set through the serverName plugin parameter, and a new one is generated for each new generation of a cluster.
The archive path has to be empty when a cluster starts archiving, and a fresh, dated serverName gives us that without deleting older archives.
Over time, the bucket holds one folder per generation.
To create a recovery cluster from a given backup, we need to know which of these folders holds it. The plugin's recovery default for serverName is the name of the new cluster (internal/cnpgi/operator/config/config.go), which never matches a timestamp, so we have to find the value by listing the bucket or
digging through old manifests.
The Backup object is the natural place to keep the link between a backup and its location, and it's where the in-tree integration kept it: Backup.status.serverName, destinationPath and endpointURL were all set. Since the in-tree integration is deprecated since 1.26, anyone migrating to the plugin loses that.
Environment
- CloudNativePG operator: main (the behaviour is the same on current releases)
- plugin-barman-cloud: v0.15.1
What a plugin backup records today
apiVersion: postgresql.cnpg.io/v1
kind: Backup
spec:
method: plugin
pluginConfiguration:
name: barman-cloud.cloudnative-pg.io
status:
backupId: ...
pluginMetadata:
clusterUID: ...
displayName: ...
name: ...
pluginName: ...
timeline: "1"
version: ...
Nothing in it says where the backup went. newBackupResultMetadata (internal/cnpgi/instance/types.go) is where these keys are built.
Proposal
Add the configuration the backup was taken with to the same map:
| Key | Value |
|---|---|
barmanObjectName |
name of the ObjectStore used for the backup |
serverName |
resolved server name (the serverName parameter, or the cluster name when unset) |
destinationPath |
ObjectStore.spec.configuration.destinationPath at backup time |
endpointURL |
ObjectStore.spec.configuration.endpointURL at backup time, when set |
This only adds keys and doesn't change any existing behaviour. destinationPath and endpointURL aren't strictly needed to locate the data, since they can be read from the ObjectStore, but they let a later restore detect that the ObjectStore has been changed to point somewhere else since the backup was taken.
Shipping this early matters even if nothing consumes it yet: backups taken before it lands will never carry the information.
Alternatives considered
- Dedicated fields in
Backup.status(serverName,destinationPath): they would need new fields in the CNPG-IBackupResultmessage for concepts that are specific to Barman, sopluginMetadatalooks like the right place. - Keep the status quo and document that
serverNamemust always be set in the recovery source.
This is what we do today, but with timestamped names the value has to be found outside the cluster. - Change the default recovery
serverName: no default can guess a timestamp, and changing it would break users who rely on the current one.
I used an AI assistant (Claude) to help draft this issue and to check the references against the plugin and operator sources, as the AI policy asks for disclosure.
- 主要语言
- Go
- 星标
- 196
- 派生
- 76
- 平均合并
- 4 天 13 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 19
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud#1142 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud#1117 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
data.compression rejects zstd although barman-cloud-backup supports it可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 86/100
cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud#1104 · 4 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Add RBAC aggregation labels to ObjectStore editor/viewer ClusterRoles可能已有人在做 @stefanpeknik 于 19 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 82/100
cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud#1102 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Object store definition missing runAsUser and runAsGroup可能已有人在做 @gustabowill 于 1 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 25/100
cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud#1145 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
[submenu] nil issue on ubuntu 26.04可能已有人在做 @egoist 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 85/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
prime-radiant-inc/evener#3873 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
extract_llm_sweep / cache_aware_summarizer prefix ask 400s when thinking.budget_tokens exceeds PrefixAskMaxTokens可能已有人在做 @amiddavid 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
rossoctl/context-guru#405 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 80/100
router-for-me/CLIProxyAPI#6423 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 2 天内回复