Set internal modifier on extension methods on object CloudinaryDotNet.Core.SystemExtension

未关闭
  • 哪里不对？
#387 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
48/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
csharp
领域
api

调研方向

定位 CloudinaryDotNet.Core.SystemExtension 并检查其使用情况，以确认 Clone 和 CopyPropertiesTo 仅在内部需要。按要求更改公开的 API，然后构建 SDK 并运行其可用的测试，以验证内部调用方仍能正常工作，并且扩展方法不再可公开使用。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Removing of a "feature" request for Cloudinary .NET SDK

CloudinaryDotNet.Core add extensions methods to object base type, which might be used by the library itselve, but shouldn't be public and usable on a project using this library.
The two following extension methods must be internal only:

namespace CloudinaryDotNet.Core;

public static class SystemExtension
{
  /// <summary>Clones the object.</summary>
  /// <param name="source">The source to clone.</param>
  /// <typeparam name="T">Object type.</typeparam>
  /// <returns>New instance of the cloned object.</returns>
  public static T Clone<T>(this T source)
  {
    return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject((object) source));
  }

  /// <summary>
  /// Copies the writable properties from the source object to the destination object.
  /// </summary>
  /// <param name="source">The source object whose properties will be copied.</param>
  /// <param name="destination">The destination object where the properties will be copied.</param>
  public static void CopyPropertiesTo(this object source, object destination)
  {
    foreach (PropertyInfo runtimeProperty in typeof (FileDescription).GetRuntimeProperties())
    {
      if (runtimeProperty.CanWrite)
      {
        object obj = runtimeProperty.GetValue(source);
        runtimeProperty.SetValue(destination, obj);
      }
    }
  }
}

Explain your use case

I shouldn't be able to use these methods on any object of my domain, system object, etc.
For example, this code is "syntaxically" ok, but absolutely not in execution:

        System.Net.Http.SocketsHttpHandler handler = new System.Net.Http.SocketsHttpHandler();
        handler.Clone();

Describe the problem you’re trying to solve

From my point of view, this is the responsibility of each projects to add the extension methods they need on base system type.
When I use a library to simplify access to cloudinary API, i don't expect to get some system type helper methods, which:

  1. will not works as i expect regarding they naming. Each people will have a different perception of what a "Clone" method do, maybe from your use case, Json IN/OUT is enough, but for another person, it will not be the case.
  2. will create a dependence on the library outside of the desired scope. (CloudinaryDotNet.Core would be used only on a "CdnConnectorService", but might be used everywhere because of that. )

Do you have a proposed solution?

Set these methods / extension class as internal instead of public.

(thanks for your work on the library btw! :) )

主要语言
C#
星标
105
派生
72
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

cloudinary/CloudinaryDotNet 的其他 Issue

查看 cloudinary/CloudinaryDotNet 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C# Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。