`worker.rejected` carries `count: 1` on an isolated refusal, which the catalogs say it must never do
维护者通常 1 天内回复
评估
这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。
描述
What is wrong
worker.rejected carries count: 1 on an isolated refusal, which the catalogs say it must never do
Where this came from
Confirmed in the bug bounty sweep tracked on #648 (finding 3). The reproduction was reproduced independently by the orchestrating session, the proposed fix confirmed green against the surrounding suite, and the finding re-confirmed against current main.
Spec
Area: src/gateway/service.ts (uplink rejection coalescing)
Severity: low, audit trail only. No state damage and no protocol change
needed — but count's presence is the documented signal that a flood happened,
so count: 1 tells an operator "one refusal was absorbed by an earlier window"
when there was no flood at all. Any consumer treating count !== undefined as
"there was a flood" — the documented reading — is wrong.
Kind: defect — the emitted payload is one the contract's own documentation
says must be omitted.
Problem
GatewayService#recordRejection coalesces refusals per (reason, claimed id)
into one-second windows. When a window ages out, the next matching refusal
reports that window's total as count.
A window that absorbed exactly one refusal has total 1, and that 1 is passed
straight to registry.rejected, which omits count only when it is undefined.
So two lone refusals an apart — the "overwhelmingly common case of an
isolated refusal" that the code's own comment names — make the second event carry
count: 1.
A misconfigured or revoked worker redialling on its 1 s → 30 s backoff therefore
carries count: 1 on nearly every refusal it ever emits. The backoff puts each
dial outside the previous window by design, so this is the normal path for the
exact scenario the event exists to describe (ADR 0005 §22: "a worker whose
credentials were mistyped or revoked").
The comment sitting four lines above the bug states the opposite of the code:
// src/gateway/service.ts:188-192
// ... so a lone refusal keeps the exact
// pre-P-2 payload shape (no `count` field at all) rather than gaining a
// redundant `count: 1`.
A refusal whose predecessor window held one lone refusal is a lone refusal, and
it does not keep that shape.
Root cause
src/gateway/service.ts:201 — this.#registry.rejected(reason, workerId, label, previousTotal), with previousTotal read at :193 — hands the previous
window's raw count onward without the "above one" rule the comment above it
states. WorkerRegistry#rejected (src/gateway/worker-registry.ts:339) then
omits only count === undefined, so a 1 reaches the bus.
Three independent sources bind the value, all agreeing:
docs/EVENTS.md:108 `count`, present only above one, is how many identical
refusals a coalescing window absorbed
docs/internal/EVENTS.md:165 `count`, present only above one, is how many identical
(reason, claimed id) refusals the *previous* coalescing
window absorbed — GatewayService computes it before
calling into the registry
src/gateway/worker-registry.ts:324 Omitted (not zero or one) outside a flood, so the
payload is unchanged from before this fix in the
overwhelmingly common case of an isolated refusal.
Why the existing P-2 test never caught it: its third assertion uses a different
claimed id (wrk_other), whose previous total is genuinely undefined. The
same-id-after-aging-out path is unexercised.
Evidence
Test file: src/gateway/zz-orchestrator-rejection-count.test.ts
(written independently by the orchestrator from the reported root
cause — the finder's own scratch file was lost when its session
ended, so this is a fresh reproduction, not a re-run)
Test title: worker.rejected payload across aged-out windows > carries no count
when the previous window absorbed a single refusal
Command: pnpm exec vitest run --project unit \
src/gateway/zz-orchestrator-rejection-count.test.ts
AssertionError: expected { reason: 'unauthenticated', …(2) } to not have
property "count"
- Expected: undefined
+ Received: 1
❯ src/gateway/zz-orchestrator-rejection-count.test.ts:49:40
47| await expect(dial()).rejects.toMatchObject({ code: "rejected" });
48| expect(rejected()).toHaveLength(2);
49| expect(rejected()[1]?.payload).not.toHaveProperty("count");
Honesty checks:
- The reproduction asserts the first refusal carries no
counttoo, so the
harness itself cannot be silently mis-wired — that assertion is load-bearing. - Broke it a second way (
previousTotal ?? 0, so a count is never omitted): still
fails at:49, so it keys on the omission rule and not on the literal1. - Broke it a third way (
count: 1on every emission): fails earlier at the first
assertion. - With the fix: this test passes and the entire
src/gatewaymodule is green —
23 files, 695 tests, including the P-2 test'scount: 2assertion at
service.test.ts:1818, which pins that a genuine two-dial window still reports
its tally. Source reverted to HEAD afterwards; only the scratch test remains.
Proposed fix
src/gateway/service.ts:201 — apply the documented bound at the point the count
is handed over, where the coalescing fact lives:
this.#registry.rejected(reason, workerId, label, previousTotal === 1 ? undefined : previousTotal);
previousTotal can only be undefined, 1, or more, so === 1 is exhaustive and
0 is unreachable. No protocol bump: nothing on the wire changes shape, only the
presence of a field already optional and already documented as absent here. No
comment or doc change is needed either — the comment at service.ts:188-192
already describes this behaviour; the fix is what makes it true.
Alternatives rejected
- Drop a
countof one insideWorkerRegistry#rejected— both catalogs state
GatewayServicecomputes the count before calling into the registry, so the
registry would be deciding a coalescing fact that is not its own (architecture
rule: one place enforces a rule). - Reset
#recentRejectionsentries once a window ages out — an aged-out window's
total is exactly the information the next event is supposed to carry; this
would lose the flood tally the mechanism exists for. - Widen the docs to allow
count: 1— the field's whole purpose is that its
presence marks a flood, and two EVENTS.md cuts, theEventMap, and the
registry's own doc comment all currently promise otherwise.
Risk
count: 2must still be reported for a genuine two-dial window —
service.test.ts:1818pins it and stays green.- A reviewer should confirm no consumer keys on
count === 1. None exists in this
repo: the console touches this event's payload only to decide worker
attribution (event-list.ts, deliberately ignoring the claimedworkerId), and
never readscount; the gateway relays envelopes verbatim. - Worth a look in the same PR:
MAX_TRACKED_REJECTION_WINDOWSeviction drops the
oldest window, so an evicted key's next refusal behaves as never-seen and emits
nocount. That is correct in itself, and unchanged by this fix.
Written by an agent.
Written by an agent.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 20
- 派生
- 2
- 平均合并
- 8 小时 13 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 297
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
callstackincubator/simlock 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
callstackincubator/simlock#639 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
feature:spec
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
callstackincubator/simlock#771 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Console: ⌘K search or jump to可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭task:ready
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
callstackincubator/simlock#770 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Console: release, cancel, drain, undrain and remove from the console可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭task:ready
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
callstackincubator/simlock#769 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Console: Overview home and Inbox可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭task:ready
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 38/100
callstackincubator/simlock#768 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 callstackincubator/simlock 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
Area/Cloud Needs Triage Type/Bug
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 86/100
wso2/product-integrator#2847 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 67/100
bluesky-social/social-app#12118 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 77/100
heygen-com/hyperframes#6021 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
check:passed streams:edit
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复