[bot] Anthropic: MCP connector tool calls (`mcp_tool_use`/`mcp_tool_result`) are silently dropped from tool spans
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 2/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 新手友好度
- 75/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- python
调研方向
问题位于 py/src/braintrust/integrations/anthropic/tracing.py。首先阅读第 1455 行附近的 _log_server_tool_spans 函数以及 _SERVER_TOOL_USE_TYPE 和 _is_server_tool_result_type 的定义。修复方法是扩展调用端检查,使其也匹配 "mcp_tool_use"。确保 mcp_tool_result 块与其调用正确配对。运行 Anthropic 集成的现有测试以验证修复。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Summary
Anthropic's MCP connector feature (tools=[{"type": "mcp_toolset", ...}] on client.messages.create(), gated by the mcp-client-2025-11-20 beta header) returns mcp_tool_use and mcp_tool_result content blocks when Claude calls a remote MCP server's tools. The repo's Anthropic tracing does not recognize mcp_tool_use as a tool call at all, so:
- MCP tool calls are never captured into a span (no input, no tool name, no call metadata).
- MCP tool results are still detected (because the result-type check is suffix-based) but are logged as orphaned spans with no call context, since the corresponding call was never registered.
This is a correctness gap, not just missing-coverage: half of each MCP tool exchange is dropped and the other half is logged incompletely/incorrectly.
What is missing
In py/src/braintrust/integrations/anthropic/tracing.py:
_SERVER_TOOL_USE_TYPE = "server_tool_use" # line 1337
def _is_server_tool_result_type(item_type: Any) -> bool: # line 1340
return isinstance(item_type, str) and item_type.endswith("_tool_result") and item_type != "tool_result"
_log_server_tool_spans (line 1455) pairs calls and results by walking response content:
item_type = item.get("type")
if item_type == _SERVER_TOOL_USE_TYPE: # line 1470 — only matches "server_tool_use"
...
continue
if not _is_server_tool_result_type(item_type): # line 1481
continue
- The call-side check only matches the literal string
"server_tool_use"(used for built-in server tools like web search / code execution). It does not match"mcp_tool_use", somcp_tool_useblocks fall through the loop entirely and are never added tocalls_by_id. - The result-side check (
_is_server_tool_result_type) matches anything ending in_tool_resultexcept the literaltool_result, somcp_tool_resultdoes pass this check — but since no matching call was ever registered, it's appended as(None, item), producing a tool span with output only and no input/tool name.
Separately, _MANAGED_AGENTS_CALL_TYPES (line 905) does include "agent.mcp_tool_use" — but that's the distinct, agent.-prefixed type used by the Managed Agents API (client.beta.agents/client.beta.sessions), not the plain mcp_tool_use/mcp_tool_result types returned by the standard Messages API's MCP connector.
Braintrust docs status: unclear / not_found
The Anthropic integration page mentions mcp_servers exactly once, as one of many request parameters captured in span metadata for the Go SDK's request-param list. It does not mention mcp_toolset, mcp_tool_use, or mcp_tool_result anywhere, and does not document any tool-span behavior specific to the MCP connector for any language. The only documented span-splitting for server-side tools is generic ("server-side tool calls ... appear as child tool spans"), described for the Java SDK, and is not confirmed to apply to MCP connector blocks specifically.
Upstream sources
- Anthropic MCP connector docs: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/mcp-connector — confirms the
mcp_toolsettool type, themcp-client-2025-11-20beta header, and the exact response content block types"mcp_tool_use"and"mcp_tool_result"(example response blocks shown verbatim in the "How MCP connector tool calls work" section).
Local repo files inspected
py/src/braintrust/integrations/anthropic/tracing.py(full file, 1627 lines) — specifically_SERVER_TOOL_USE_TYPE(line 1337),_is_server_tool_result_type(line 1340),_log_server_tool_spans(line 1455),_MANAGED_AGENTS_CALL_TYPES(line 905)py/src/braintrust/integrations/anthropic/integration.pypy/src/braintrust/integrations/anthropic/patchers.py
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 19
- 派生
- 17
- 平均合并
- 1 天 5 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 61
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 86/100
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 65/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
查看 braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-python 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
agent-ready documentation needs-triage
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
-
documentation
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 91/100
-
workflow-status page template still says reusable workflows are "triggered only by workflow_call:" 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 92/100
-
instance instance add
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 72/100
searxng/searx-instances#939 · 1 条评论 ·
-
area-deployment area-integrations triage:bot-seen
难度 2/5 半天 新手友好度 86/100