Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[bot] Google GenAI video generation (generateVideos / Veo) traced with materially less detail than text generation

未关闭
#176 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
55/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
java

调研方向

从 BraintrustApiClient.java 开始,重点查看 tagSpan 和四个传输重写,然后检查 BraintrustGenAITest.java 以及 Google GenAI 的 generateVideos 和 getVideosOperation API。为视频生成添加有针对性的覆盖,并验证请求详细信息、span 分类、可用指标以及长时间运行操作的轮询是否以预期的保真度得到体现。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Summary

The Google GenAI Java SDK (com.google.genai, v1.18.0, the version this module targets) exposes Models.generateVideos(...) (Veo video-generation models) and the associated long-running-operation polling API (client.operations.getVideosOperation(...)). Braintrust's Java GenAI instrumentation intercepts these calls only incidentally, through a generic HTTP-transport hook that was designed for generateContent. The result is spans that are silently mislabeled and largely empty for video generation — not a total absence of spans, but instrumentation with materially less detail/fidelity than the documented generate_content path.

What is missing

BraintrustApiClient (braintrust-sdk/instrumentation/genai_1_18_0/src/main/java/com/google/genai/BraintrustApiClient.java) intercepts every HTTP call made by the SDK by overriding the transport-level methods on ApiClient:

  • request(String, String, String, Optional<HttpOptions>) — line 186
  • request(String, String, byte[], Optional<HttpOptions>) — line 210
  • asyncRequest(String, String, String, Optional<HttpOptions>) — line 239
  • asyncRequest(String, String, byte[], Optional<HttpOptions>) — line 277

Because this hook is transport-level, a generateVideos call (and each operations.getVideosOperation poll of the resulting long-running operation) does produce a span — but tagSpan (lines 50–161) was written exclusively for the generateContent request/response shape:

  • Line 156 unconditionally sets braintrust.span_attributes to {"type": "llm"} for every call this client makes, including video-generation calls, which are not LLM chat-completion calls.
  • Lines 65–76 and 81–95 only promote model/systemInstruction/tools/toolConfig/safetySettings/cachedContent and generationConfig.{temperature,topP,topK,candidateCount,maxOutputTokens,stopSequences,responseMimeType,responseSchema} into braintrust.metadata/input_json. generateVideos requests use an entirely different shape (instances/parameters or prompt/image/video + a GenerateVideosConfig with fields like numberOfVideos, durationSeconds, aspectRatio, enhancePrompt, personGeneration) — none of these fields are extracted, so input_json for a video-generation span is effectively empty.
  • Lines 127–149 only look for usageMetadata.{promptTokenCount,candidatesTokenCount,totalTokenCount,cachedContentTokenCount} to populate braintrust.metrics. Video-generation responses have no such field, so metrics are silently skipped (not wrong, just absent) while the span is still tagged type: llm.
  • generateVideos returns a GenerateVideosOperation that is not done immediately; the caller polls client.operations.getVideosOperation(...) repeatedly until completion. Each poll produces its own disconnected span (named via URL-derived getOperation, e.g. get_videos_operation) rather than being correlated to the originating video-generation request — there is no long-running-operation span model, unlike the single request/response span Braintrust produces for generate_content.

There is no reference anywhere in this module (or its tests) to generateVideos, GenerateVideosOperation, GenerateVideosConfig, Veo, or getVideosOperation — confirmed via full-directory grep of braintrust-sdk/instrumentation/genai_1_18_0/.

Braintrust docs status

Checked https://www.braintrust.dev/docs/integrations/ai-providers/gemini (current as of this audit):

  • Java section documents only content-generation spans (generate_content, sync/async) and generateContentStream, with request metadata (model, contents, generation config), response, and token metrics.
  • No mention of video generation, generateVideos, or Veo models for any language (Java, Python, TypeScript, Go).
  • Status: not_found — video generation tracing is undocumented for Java (and for every other language) in the current docs.

Upstream sources

Local files inspected

  • braintrust-sdk/instrumentation/genai_1_18_0/src/main/java/com/google/genai/BraintrustApiClient.java — full file read; tagSpan (lines 50–161) and the four transport overrides (lines 186, 210, 239, 277) are the only interception points, and are generateContent-shaped.
  • braintrust-sdk/instrumentation/genai_1_18_0/src/test/java/dev/braintrust/instrumentation/genai/v1_18_0/BraintrustGenAITest.java — only tests sync generateContent; no video-generation test coverage.
  • Full-directory grep of braintrust-sdk/instrumentation/genai_1_18_0/ for generateImages|GenerateImages|predictLongRunning|generate_videos|video — zero matches.
主要语言
Java
星标
21
派生
5
平均合并
1 天 20 小时
30 天内合并 PR
8

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-java 的其他 Issue

查看 braintrustdata/braintrust-sdk-java 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。