Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

breakpoints(): Better handling of time

未关闭
#15 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 查看

@GreatEmerald 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2020年9月29日。

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

描述

enhancement

At the moment, the time attribute in breakpoints() gets lost most of the time, leading to output such as:

 Optimal 2-segment partition: 

Call:
breakpoints.matrix(X = X, y = y, h = h, breaks = breaks, hpc = hpc)

Breakpoints at observation number:
104 

Corresponding to breakdates:
0.4521739

This is not useful, as the breakdates should actually tell you which year and day the break happened, rather than in which part of the time series it happened (that's already given by the observation number).

It works properly if the input is a ts object, since then datatsp is preserved. However, it is rare to run breakpoints() over a ts rather than a bfastpp() data.frame. The latter contains time as a column, which should then be preserved.

I propose to handle time better and different from the other covariates in X. If the input is ts, then decompose its input into year fractions as per bfastpp. If the input is a data.frame, make use of the time column. Add a time element to the result that holds the timestamps, either as POSIXct or year fractions.

This is a prerequisite to better plotting of breakpoints() diagnostics, as as it is it is impossible to plot the time series with correct labels, or to put the breakpoint at a particular time.

主要语言
R
星标
6
派生
5
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

bfast2/strucchangeRcpp 的其他 Issue

查看 bfast2/strucchangeRcpp 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 R Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。