Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Null list<struct<...>> is written and read as an empty list

未关闭
#3,833 1 条评论 1 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
半天
新手友好度
45/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python

调研方向

从 pyiceberg/io/pyarrow.py:2078 的 ArrowProjectionVisitor.list 开始,检查 tests/integration/test_reads.py::test_null_list_and_map。确认该复现能够在写入的 Parquet 文件中以及读取时保留 null struct lists,然后运行聚焦的集成测试和相关的单元测试;当恢复的 assertion 通过且未使 primitive-list 处理出现回归时,即表示完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Apache Iceberg version

main (development)

Please describe the bug 🐞

A null list<struct<...>> is silently rebuilt as an empty list. This is known on
the read path — tests/integration/test_reads.py::test_null_list_and_map currently
asserts the corrupted value, with the correct assertion commented out pending
apache/arrow#38809:

# This should be:
# assert arrow_table["col_list_with_struct"].to_pylist() == [None, [{'test': 1}]]
# Once https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/38809 has been fixed
assert arrow_table["col_list_with_struct"].to_pylist() == [[], [{"test": 1}]]

Two things seem worth reporting on top of that.

It also affects the write path, where the consequence is worse. The Parquet file
pyiceberg writes contains an empty list, so the null is gone at rest and no reader —
pyiceberg, Spark, Trino — can recover it. On read the file is at least still correct.

It does not depend on the upstream Arrow fix. pa.LargeListArray.from_arrays
takes a mask argument — since well before pyiceberg's pyarrow>=18.0.0 floor — so
this particular null loss can be fixed independently of apache/arrow#38809, which is
still open.

This is the array<struct<>> case from #251. That issue was closed in March 2025 on
the strength of this test existing, but the assertion it makes is the corrupted one;
the array<int> case in the issue body was genuinely fixed by #252, while the
array<struct<test:int>> case in the issue title — which @HonahX flagged as
remaining broken in
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/252#discussion_r1467065763 — was not.

Reproduction (write path)

pyiceberg 0.11.1, pyarrow 25.0.1:

import os, shutil, glob
import pyarrow as pa, pyarrow.parquet as pq
from pyiceberg.catalog.sql import SqlCatalog

WH = "/tmp/wh"; shutil.rmtree(WH, ignore_errors=True); os.makedirs(WH)

sch = pa.schema([
    pa.field("id", pa.int32(), nullable=False),
    pa.field("l_struct", pa.list_(pa.field("element", pa.struct([pa.field("x", pa.int32())]), nullable=True)), nullable=True),
    pa.field("l_int",    pa.list_(pa.field("element", pa.int32(), nullable=True)), nullable=True),
])
tbl = pa.table({"id": [1, 2, 3, 4],
                "l_struct": [[{"x": 1}], [], None, [{"x": 3}]],
                "l_int":    [[1],        [], None, [3]]}, schema=sch)

cat = SqlCatalog("r", uri=f"sqlite:///{WH}/c.db", warehouse=f"file://{WH}")
cat.create_namespace("ns")
it = cat.create_table("ns.t", schema=tbl.schema)
it.append(tbl)

out = it.scan().to_arrow()
for c in ("l_struct", "l_int"):
    print(f"{c:9s} in={tbl.column(c).to_pylist()!s:35s} out={out.column(c).to_pylist()}")

# the loss is already in the file on disk, not in the read path
f = glob.glob(f"{WH}/**/*.parquet", recursive=True)[0]
print("raw parquet:", pq.read_table(f).column("l_struct").to_pylist())

Output:

l_struct  in=[[{'x': 1}], [], None, [{'x': 3}]]  out=[[{'x': 1}], [], [], [{'x': 3}]]
l_int     in=[[1], [], None, [3]]                out=[[1], [], None, [3]]
raw parquet: [[{'x': 1}], [], [], [{'x': 3}]]

l_int round-trips correctly, and writing the same pa.Table with pq.write_table
preserves the null, so the loss is not pyarrow's.

Cause

ArrowProjectionVisitor.list rebuilds the array when the element is a struct
(pyiceberg/io/pyarrow.py:2078 on main @ 7539661):

if isinstance(value_array, pa.StructArray):
    # This can be removed once this has been fixed:
    # https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/38809
    list_array = pa.LargeListArray.from_arrays(list_array.offsets, value_array)

from_arrays receives the offsets buffer alone, which cannot express a null list, and
no mask, so the validity bitmap is dropped. That is also why only this one shape is
affected: the struct visitor passes mask=struct_array.is_null(), the map visitor
does not rebuild at all, and a list whose element is a primitive never enters this
branch. The visitor runs on both paths, which is why the same root cause shows up as
the read-side assertion above and as the write-side corruption here.

Fix

Carrying the mask over is enough:

list_array = pa.LargeListArray.from_arrays(list_array.offsets, value_array, mask=list_array.is_null())

With that change the reproduction above returns None for both columns, and
test_null_list_and_map passes with its commented-out assertion restored. I have not
looked at int32-offset or sliced-array handling of this call, which the existing line
already relies on; that appears independent of the mask.

I have this on a branch with a unit test covering the write path and the integration
assertion un-commented, and can open a PR.

Found while testing a third-party Iceberg writer against pyiceberg as a reader.

Willingness to contribute
  • I can contribute a fix for this bug independently
主要语言
Python
星标
1.1k
派生
589
平均合并
1 天 20 小时
30 天内合并 PR
68

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

apache/iceberg-python 的其他 Issue

查看 apache/iceberg-python 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。