[Bug] Store ships rocksdb.total_memory_size of 32 GB, ignores the container memory limit, and Docker users cannot override it
维护者通常 1 天内回复
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 52/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- docker, java, kubernetes
调研方向
Start with application-pd.yml and AppConfig.java to trace how rocksdb.total_memory_size is selected, then read RaftRocksdbOptions.java and RocksDBOptions.java to understand the cache split. Inspect docker-entrypoint.sh and the deployment guide for configuration behavior and documented defaults. Done means the Store's RocksDB budget respects the process or container memory and Docker users can override it without breaking the documented configuration.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Bug Type (问题类型)
server status (启动/运行异常)
Before submit
- 我已经确认现有的 Issues 与 FAQ 中没有相同 / 重复问题 (I have confirmed and searched that there are no similar problems in the historical issue and documents)
Searched for total_memory_size, store OOM, SPRING_APPLICATION_JSON and application-pd.yml. #2847 contains total_memory_size: 64GB, but that is the reporter's own config pasted into a data-sync bug, not this problem.
Environment (环境信息)
- Code: apache/hugegraph master
176fb56dd(2026-10-02). All line references below are at that commit. - Backend: HStore, 3 Stores on k3s, cluster preset of the Helm chart in hugegraph/hugegraph#221 (chart
05f3d9e, PD/Store images of 2026-09-18), Store started with-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=512m - Data Size: load of 5M vertices with a 1 KB text property each; the Stores died from vertex 2.36M on, holding about 1.0-1.3 GB of RocksDB data and 4.2 GB of raft log each
- Run and measurements by Sebastian Gruza, 2026-09-19: https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph/pull/221#issuecomment-5740338545
- All three Stores in that run log profiles
"pd", "default"andtotal_memory_size:32000000000at startup (store-1, lines 28 and 44-48). The comment's memory accounting assumes the key is unset and falls back to the heap size; these logs show it is set.
Expected & Actual behavior (期望与实际表现)
Expected: the Store's RocksDB budget fits inside the memory the process is given, or a Docker user can set it.
Actual: loading the data above OOM-killed all three Stores at a 4Gi container limit (Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process (java) anon-rss:4154896kB), and they crash-looped afterwards. With the limit raised to 8Gi they stayed up, and store-1 measured 4.42 GiB anonymous RSS. The 8Gi limit only adds headroom; nothing bounds RocksDB below 32 GB.
Why nothing keeps RocksDB inside the limit, in code (the 4.42 GiB was not broken down per allocator, so the RocksDB share of it is not measured):
application-pd.yml:28-30setsrocksdb.total_memory_size: 32000000000. The shippedapplication.ymlincludes thepdprofile (application.yml:57-59). The copy inside the jar has the same value (hg-store-node/src/main/resources/application-pd.yml:37).- Because the key is set, the existing fallback in
AppConfig.java:104-107(useRuntime.maxMemory()when the key is missing or0) never runs. RaftRocksdbOptions.java:155-167splits the value into a write cache for theWriteBufferManagerand a block cache. With the defaultwrite_buffer_ratioof 0.66 (hg-store-rocksdb/.../RocksDBOptions.java:43-49) that is about 21.1 GB and 10.9 GB. Both are nativeLRUCaches, off-heap, so together they grow with data up to 32 GB and are not limited by the heap or the cgroup.RaftRocksdbOptions.java:69adds a separate 1 GBLRUCachefor the raft log storage on top.- The heap is limited separately.
hugegraph-store/Dockerfile:43sets-XX:MaxRAMPercentage=50, butstart-hugegraph-store.sh:145-152also passes-Xmxfromcalc_xmx(util.sh:179-197: 512 MB to 2 GB, half of free memory read from/proc/meminfo), and an explicit-Xmxtakes precedence. Neither value feeds intototal_memory_size. - Docker users cannot change it.
docker-entrypoint.sh:58-70buildsSPRING_APPLICATION_JSONfrom the fiveHG_STORE_*variables only and exports it, so aSPRING_APPLICATION_JSONpassed to the container is overwritten, and noHG_STORE_*variable maps to arocksdb.*key.
Possible workaround, untested: AppConfig.java:307-313 binds rocksdb as a map with @ConfigurationProperties(prefix = ""), so JAVA_OPTS="... -Drocksdb.total_memory_size=<bytes>" may reach the map key. Nobody has verified that it binds.
Fix direction (proposal):
- Derive the default from the memory the process actually has (cgroup limit, or the limit minus heap and direct memory) instead of a fixed 32 GB. Dropping the line from
application-pd.ymlalone would hand the budget to theRuntime.maxMemory()fallback, which sizes RocksDB equal to the heap; that is a smaller number but still a second heap-sized allocation on top of the first. - Add an
HG_STORE_ROCKSDB_TOTAL_MEMORY_SIZE(or similar) variable to the entrypoint's JSON, so container and Helm users can set it explicitly. hugegraph-store/docs/deployment-guide.md:348documents the 32 GB value and would need the same change.
Vertex/Edge example (问题点 / 边数据举例)
Not data specific. In the reported run the OOM came once each Store held about 1.0-1.3 GB of RocksDB data.
Schema [VertexLabel, EdgeLabel, IndexLabel] (元数据结构)
Not schema specific. The reported run used one vertex label with a 1 KB text property.
- 主要语言
- Java
- 星标
- 3.2k
- 派生
- 640
- 平均合并
- 1 天 9 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 84
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
apache/hugegraph 的其他 Issue
-
[Bug] PD task REST: balanceLeaders throws a bare HTTP 500 during the balance-shard window, and task responses cannot be told apart from a no-op or a follower answer可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
apache/hugegraph#3231 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[Task] Establish systematic performance baselines and optimization tracking可能已有人在做 @contrueCT 于 1 天前认领。 未关闭help wanted improvement rust
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 12/100
apache/hugegraph#3346 · 2 条评论 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 66/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[Bug] Cypher endpoint rejects the standard date() function as unknown可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭bug
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 52/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[Bug] CI accepts obsolete PR targets after retargeting or force-push可能重新可做 关联的 PR 已关闭且未合并。 未关闭
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 25/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
-
bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
PhasetransCrystal/FPSMatch#47 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 76/100
apache/maven-toolchains-plugin#205 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[Bug] Dated CSV export filenames use the UTC day rather than the operator day可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#6896 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复