Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Restarting a KVM VMs after its host fails when the management server is also unreachable

未关闭
#14,230 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
java, kubernetes, python

调研方向

The issue describes a distributed systems problem requiring a new cluster mechanism for VM HA. Start by reviewing the existing KVM agent code and the linked PR #13589 and issue #14206. Understand how CloudStack currently handles host failures and VM restarts via the management server. Research Corosync/Pacemaker and LINSTOR/drbd-reactor integration possibilities. The goal is to design a system where agents can autonomously restart VMs during a management server outage.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

component:kvm type:new-feature
The required feature described as a wish

Today if a KVM host fails and the management server and/or database is unreachable at the same moment (a remote site outage, a network partition, or the management server itself running as a guest on the failing host) CloudStack cannot restart the affected VMs. Every HA and DRS decision path runs inside the management server process and depends on the database.

I propose to add a small, storage-aware cluster mechanism that can restart a VM on a surviving host using its own quorum and fencing, and hands control back cleanly once the management server returns. This might require the Agents to actually keep shadow copy of each of the VMs configuration (of just enough per-VM data to rebuild the libvirt domain: disk identifiers, NIC MACs, CPU/memory, bridge/VLAN mapping). Possibly the agents can exchange information with each other and in case one Agent looses connectivity to management server act as a proxy towards the management server?

This might be an addition/similar or even fix to the https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13589 , https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/14206 , or rely on some other mechanisms as surviving hosts must agree "host A (and possibly the management server) is gone" without a central arbiter and must not false-positive on an ordinary network hiccup,

Options I see as viable:

  • Generic - Corosync for membership, Pacemaker for orchestration, IPMI/BMC STONITH for fencing.
  • Storage specific - LINSTOR + drbd-reactor, CloudStack already ships a maintained LINSTOR primary storage plugin whose KVM-side driver talks straight to the LINSTOR controller, bypassing the management server for volume attach, and drbd quorum enforces split-brain protection, so it might be a nice addition.
主要语言
Java
星标
3.1k
派生
1.4k
平均合并
6 天 20 小时
30 天内合并 PR
27

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

apache/cloudstack 的其他 Issue

查看 apache/cloudstack 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。