Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[Bug] Non-superuser can bypass the external-table protocol privilege check via utility-mode connections

未关闭
#1,992 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
新手友好度
72/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
c, postgresql

调研方向

从 gpcontrib/gp_exttable_fdw/option.c 开始,检查 gp_exttable_permission_check(),然后查看 src/backend/cdb/cdbvars.c 中的 check_gp_role(),以了解可达的 utility-mode 路径。在 src/test/isolation2/input/external_table.source 中添加回归测试,覆盖 utility-mode 下由无特权用户创建 file:// 和 gpfdist:// 表的情况;完成的标准是两者都被拒绝,并且 pg_class 中不出现任何 relation。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

type: Bug type: Security
Apache Cloudberry version

Affected: 2.1.0-incubating and earlier, and current main (verified on c781604c5ba).

What happened

The privilege check that enforces "only a superuser may create a file:// external table"
is skipped entirely when the session runs in utility mode.

In gpcontrib/gp_exttable_fdw/option.c, gp_exttable_permission_check() gates the whole
check block on the dispatch role:

if (!is_superuser && Gp_role == GP_ROLE_DISPATCH)
{
    /*
     * - Never allow 'file' exttables if not superuser.
     * - Allow http, gpfdist or gpfdists tables if pg_auth has the right
     *   permissions for this role and for this type of table
     */
    is_valid_locationuris(location_list, is_writable);
    ...
}

Under Gp_role == GP_ROLE_UTILITY the condition is false, so neither the file://
superuser restriction nor the gpfdist/gpfdists pg_authid privilege checks
(rolcreaterexthttp, rolcreaterextgpfd, rolcreatewextgpfd) ever run.

The role is reachable by an unprivileged user: gp_role is a PGC_BACKEND GUC, and
its validator check_gp_role() (src/backend/cdb/cdbvars.c) has no superuser gate —
it only forbids upgrading an already-assigned role. A client can therefore request
utility mode in the startup packet (PGOPTIONS='-c gp_role=utility') as an ordinary
login role.

The resulting table is a normal catalog entry. Once created in a utility-mode session,
it can be read from an ordinary dispatch session, so the attacker gets arbitrary
server-side file reads with the privileges of the OS account running the database
(/etc/passwd, pg_hba.conf, postgresql.conf, key material, WAL and data files, …).

What you think should happen instead

The file:// protocol restriction — and the pg_authid protocol privileges for
gpfdist/gpfdists — are security boundaries and must hold in every connection mode
a user can reach. gp_role is a transport/topology setting, not an authorization
level, so it must not be able to turn a privilege check off.

How to reproduce
# 1. As a superuser, create an unprivileged login role.
psql -p 7000 -c "CREATE ROLE lowpriv LOGIN;"

# 2. Connect as that role in utility mode and create a file:// external table.
PGOPTIONS='-c gp_role=utility' psql -p 7000 -U lowpriv -d postgres <<'SQL'
SELECT current_setting('gp_role');   -- utility
SELECT current_setting('is_superuser');  -- off
CREATE READABLE EXTERNAL TABLE etc_passwd (data text)
  LOCATION ('file://localhost/etc/passwd') FORMAT 'TEXT';
SQL
# Expected: ERROR: must be superuser to create an external table with a file protocol
# Actual:   CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE

# 3. Read it back from an ordinary (dispatch) session as the same unprivileged role.
psql -p 7000 -U lowpriv -d postgres -c "SELECT * FROM etc_passwd;"

The same bypass applies to gpfdist:// / gpfdists:// locations for a role that lacks
rolcreaterextgpfd, and to the http:// protocol for a role that lacks rolcreaterexthttp.

Operating System

Rocky Linux 9.6 (Blue Onyx). Not OS-specific.

Anything else

Impact. CVSS v3.1 6.5 Medium —
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N. Reproducible every time; no race, no special
cluster configuration. This is not by design: the superuser-only restriction on
file:// is documented and is simply not reached in utility mode.

Proposed fix. Run the check in utility mode as well:

-    if(!is_superuser && Gp_role == GP_ROLE_DISPATCH)
+    if(!is_superuser &&
+       (Gp_role == GP_ROLE_DISPATCH || Gp_role == GP_ROLE_UTILITY))

GP_ROLE_EXECUTE is deliberately left out. That role is only ever set by the internal
dispatch handshake and cannot be forged through PGOPTIONS, so excluding it closes the
hole without re-validating DDL on the segments that the coordinator has already checked.

Test coverage. A regression case belongs in
src/test/isolation2/input/external_table.source: from a -1U (utility) session,
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION to a non-superuser role and assert that both a file://
and an unprivileged gpfdist:// CREATE READABLE EXTERNAL TABLE are rejected, then
assert nothing was created in pg_class.

Credit. Reported to [email protected] by Geo ([email protected]); triaged and
accepted by the Apache Cloudberry PMC. Back-ports to affected release branches to follow.

  • Yes, I am willing to submit a PR!
主要语言
C
星标
1.4k
派生
248
平均合并
4 天 10 小时
30 天内合并 PR
40

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

apache/cloudberry 的其他 Issue

查看 apache/cloudberry 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。