[Unit Testing] Difficulties with mocking Firebase services in Jest/Angular environment
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 28/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- angular, firebase, typescript
调研方向
首先,在使用 @angular/fire/compat 或 @angular/fire 和 Jest 的 Angular 应用中复现 FirebaseError: No Firebase App '[DEFAULT]' has been created。检查 getAuth()、initializeApp() 和 TestBed.configureTestingModule 之间的交互。完成的标准是,repository 为依赖 Firebase 的 Angular 服务提供可靠且有文档记录的 Jest 测试策略或工具。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
When using @angular/fire/compat or @angular/fire to build Angular applications, we encounter significant challenges when trying to perform unit tests with a testing framework like Jest.
The main issue stems from the tight coupling of the Auth service (and others like Storage or Firestore) to the FirebaseApp instance. Functions like getAuth() and initializeApp() are called implicitly or explicitly by the AngularFire component, which leads to the FirebaseError: No Firebase App '[DEFAULT]' has been created error.
The core problem is that we cannot properly mock these functions before the component attempts to access them. Standard mocking techniques (e.g., jest.mock, TestBed.configureTestingModule providers) fail because the functions are either read-only properties or are called in a context where a FirebaseApp instance is expected, but not yet available.
This forces developers to use fragile workarounds to get tests to pass, making the testing process difficult and prone to errors. It also discourages writing comprehensive unit tests for components that depend on Firebase services.
Suggested Improvement:
We would appreciate it if the AngularFire team could provide an official, documented strategy for unit testing with Jest. A potential solution could involve a testing utility library or a recommended pattern that correctly mocks the underlying FirebaseApp instance and its dependent services in a reliable way.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 7.8k
- 派生
- 2.2k
- 平均合并
- 3 天 6 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 5
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
angular/angularfire 的其他 Issue
-
comp: build/pipeline type: bug version: current (v17+)
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
angular/angularfire#3766 ·
-
comp: schematics type: bug version: current (v17+)
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 76/100
angular/angularfire#3768 ·
-
comp: docs type: chore version: current (v17+)
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 58/100
angular/angularfire#3764 ·
-
comp: firestore comp: ssr priority: P0 (critical) type: feature version: current (v17+)
angular/angularfire#3757 · 已指派 1 人 ·
-
Six `firebase` entry points have no `@angular/fire` equivalent, so their exports are unreachable 未关闭comp: core type: feature
angular/angularfire#3755 · 已指派 1 人 ·
查看 angular/angularfire 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
safetrustcr/dApp-SafeTrust#426 ·
-
area:workflow bug ready-for-agent
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
fil-donadoni/tolaria#4409 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
Fission-AI/OpenSpec#1960 ·
-
Add dependabot 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
corsairdev/corsair#1764 ·