Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Verifier: google_1p_code only checks the pre-March log, and cache cleanup never deletes

未关闭
#19 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
50/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
go
领域
security

调研方向

Read internal/checkpoint/checkpoint.go and internal/tiles/reader.go, then reproduce the verifier case and the stale-cache case described in the issue. Verify google1p covers both checkpoint logs, cache cleanup removes old files from the target directory, and the large package_info.txt download completes within the configured timeout. The payload mentions no test file, so use the stated commands and examples for validation.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

google_1p_code fails every entry in the current log. The target in cmd/verifier/verifier.go points only at developers.google.com/android/binary_transparency/google1p, whose checkpoint has been at size 134 since 2026-03-30. The README lists https://www.gstatic.com/android/binary_transparency/google1p/jwt/2026/01/ as the latest shard. It's at 226 entries with none shared with the old log (192 Messages, 20 as.oss, 7 contactkeys, 7 safetycore). For example, this payload returns FAILURE: payload not verified in any log:

4bc401f3273c355a06b44cf4c0fc91e2943b8cb9b8685f0f2fda1eb409b4d7c5
SHA256(Signed Code Transparency JWT)
com.google.android.apps.messaging
322660063

It verifies after three changes: add gstatic.com/android/binary_transparency/google1p/jwt/0 to the origins in internal/checkpoint/checkpoint.go, add a target for the new base URL with the same key under that name, and use tileHeight: 8 for it (1 gets a 404 on tile/1/7/000.p/1). Keeping the old log as a fallback target, the way google_1p_apk does, would cover both. The google1p log_details page also still points at the old checkpoint and package_info.txt.

Cache cleanup never removes anything. In internal/tiles/reader.go:264 the loop lists targetDir but builds the path to remove as filepath.Join(abtCacheDir, entry.Name()), so os.Remove targets a file that doesn't exist. I put an image_info.txt_1000 dated January into <cache>/pixel/, ran --log_type=pixel to download image_info.txt_1109, and the old file was still there. For google_1p_apk each change in the 2026/01 tree size leaves another 210 MB package_info.txt_<size> behind.

Smaller: the 30 second Timeout on httpClient (reader.go:123) covers reading the body, so fetching the 210 MB package_info.txt needs about 56 Mbps. It failed with context deadline exceeded here while another download shared the link, and passed in 11 seconds without one.

主要语言
Python
星标
18
派生
5
平均合并
3 小时 43 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
8

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

android/android-binary-transparency 的其他 Issue

查看 android/android-binary-transparency 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。