refactor: revisit the triplicated buffer implementations across the tokio / embassy / wasm adapters

未关闭
#459 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
重构
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
rust

调研方向

Read docs/design/035-review-followups-deferred.md §2.3 and docs/design/038-technical-debt-and-simplification-review.md §2.3 / §3.2, then compare the buffer read paths in the three adapter files named in the issue. Check whether the documented tripwire has been hit by the late-join snapshot and record.get changes. Done means either recording a re-confirmation in 035 and closing the issue, or writing the shared core implementation design described in 038.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

🏗️ core enhancement

Problem

The three runtime adapters each hand-build the same three buffer semantics (SPMC ring, single-latest, mailbox):

File Lines Of which inline tests start at
aimdb-tokio-adapter/src/buffer.rs 1,634 line 611
aimdb-embassy-adapter/src/buffer.rs 963 line 628
aimdb-wasm-adapter/src/buffer.rs 757 line 478

Each also carries a high density of feature gates (32, 29 and 26 cfg(feature …) occurrences respectively). This is the largest structural duplication left in the workspace: a behavioural fix or a new buffer feature has to be written and tested three times, and parity between them is only enforced by tests.

Prior decisions

This is not new:

  • docs/design/038-technical-debt-and-simplification-review.md §2.3 / §3.2 proposed one portable buffer implementation in core and estimated about 2,000 lines net removed (breaking for adapter authors only).
  • docs/design/035-review-followups-deferred.md §2.3 decided "keep, with a tripwire" for the buffer-ext trait triplication.

So this issue is a request to re-check that decision, not to overturn it by default.

Suggested work

  • Check whether the tripwire condition recorded in 035 §2.3 has been hit since (e.g. by the recent late-join snapshot and record.get changes, which touched buffer read paths).
  • If it has, or if the cost has grown, write the design for a shared core implementation as 038 §3.2 sketched.
  • If not, record the re-confirmation in 035 and close this.

Notes

Line counts are from the tree at d9c7be0. I did not diff the three implementations line by line, so the amount of truly shareable code is the 038 estimate, not something I measured.

主要语言
Rust
星标
101
派生
20
平均合并
2 小时 33 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
90

环境准备

在 Codespaces 中打开

在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

aimdb-dev/aimdb 的其他 Issue

查看 aimdb-dev/aimdb 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。