python client: Authorization bearer is sent on unary RPCs only; StreamProcessOutput, ReadFile and WriteFile go out without it
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- #99 来自 @tomergee —— 已关闭,未合并
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 55/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- api, authentication
调研方向
The bug lives in clients/python/src/ate_env/client.py: start with _AuthInterceptor._inject and Env._metadata. Run the hermetic four-shape script from the issue to see which call shapes lose the authorization header. Done means the bearer arrives on unary-unary, unary-stream, stream-unary and stream-stream calls, with a regression test in clients/python/tests/test_client.py.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Summary
ate_env.Client(endpoint, auth_token=…) installs _AuthInterceptor on the grpc.aio channel to add authorization: Bearer <token> to every call. The interceptor implements all four interceptor types, but the header only reaches the server on unary-unary calls. On unary-stream (StreamProcessOutput, ReadFile), stream-unary (WriteFile) and stream-stream calls the server sees no authorization metadata at all. Anything that authenticates ate-env-api (a bearer-token proxy in front of it, or a future built-in check) therefore accepts CreateEnvironment/Info/StartProcess and rejects the first shell(), read_file() or write_file() with UNAUTHENTICATED / HTTP 401.
Root cause is in how grpc.aio (grpcio 1.84.0, the version clients/python/pyproject.toml pins as the minimum) handles interceptors on streaming calls: the metadata the interceptor returns in a new ClientCallDetails is used for unary-unary calls but ignored for the three streaming shapes, which send the original client_call_details.metadata object. _AuthInterceptor._inject builds a new list and returns new details, so its header is dropped exactly on the streaming RPCs.
Impact
- Who hits it: every user of the Python client against an authenticated
ate-env-api. Unauthenticated deployments do not notice (nothing checks the header). - What breaks:
env.shell()(viaStreamProcessOutput),env.read_file()/read_file_bytes()(ReadFile),env.write_file()(WriteFile).create(),info(),delete(),StartProcessitself work, which makes the failure look like a server-side bug on "just the streaming endpoints". - Severity: blocks all command execution and file transfer as soon as auth is on. P0 in that configuration.
Environment
agent-substrate/env@1c08a7a(2026-10-14),clients/python(ate-env-client0.1.0).- grpcio 1.84.0, Python 3.12.11 (also reproduced from a Debian
python:3.12-slimpod and macOS). - Observed against
ate-env-apifronted by an nginx bearer-token gate on an internal load balancer; the gate logs showed the unary calls withAuthorizationpresent and the streaming calls without it.
Steps to reproduce
Hermetic (no Substrate needed), ~30 lines — reproduces with the exact interceptor pattern from clients/python/src/ate_env/client.py:
import asyncio, collections, grpc
class _CCD(collections.namedtuple("_CCD", ["method","timeout","metadata","credentials","wait_for_ready"]),
grpc.aio.ClientCallDetails): pass
class AuthInterceptor(grpc.aio.UnaryUnaryClientInterceptor, grpc.aio.UnaryStreamClientInterceptor,
grpc.aio.StreamUnaryClientInterceptor, grpc.aio.StreamStreamClientInterceptor):
def _inj(self, d): # same as _AuthInterceptor._inject
md = list(d.metadata or []); md.append(("authorization", "Bearer TOK"))
return _CCD(d.method, d.timeout, md, d.credentials, d.wait_for_ready)
async def intercept_unary_unary(self, c, d, r): return await c(self._inj(d), r)
async def intercept_unary_stream(self, c, d, r): return await c(self._inj(d), r)
async def intercept_stream_unary(self, c, d, it): return await c(self._inj(d), it)
async def intercept_stream_stream(self, c, d, it):return await c(self._inj(d), it)
def hdr(ctx): return dict(ctx.invocation_metadata()).get("authorization", "<none>").encode()
async def uu(r, c): return hdr(c)
async def us(r, c): yield hdr(c)
async def su(it, c):
async for _ in it: pass
return hdr(c)
async def ss(it, c):
async for _ in it: pass
yield hdr(c)
ident = lambda x: x
async def main():
s = grpc.aio.server()
s.add_generic_rpc_handlers((grpc.method_handlers_generic_handler("t", {
"UU": grpc.unary_unary_rpc_method_handler(uu, ident, ident),
"US": grpc.unary_stream_rpc_method_handler(us, ident, ident),
"SU": grpc.stream_unary_rpc_method_handler(su, ident, ident),
"SS": grpc.stream_stream_rpc_method_handler(ss, ident, ident)}),))
p = s.add_insecure_port("127.0.0.1:0"); await s.start()
ch = grpc.aio.insecure_channel(f"127.0.0.1:{p}", interceptors=[AuthInterceptor()])
async def gen(): yield b""
print("unary_unary :", (await ch.unary_unary("/t/UU", ident, ident)(b"")).decode())
print("unary_stream :", [x async for x in ch.unary_stream("/t/US", ident, ident)(b"")][0].decode())
print("stream_unary :", (await ch.stream_unary("/t/SU", ident, ident)(gen())).decode())
print("stream_stream:", [x async for x in ch.stream_stream("/t/SS", ident, ident)(gen())][0].decode())
await ch.close(); await s.stop(0)
asyncio.run(main())
Output on grpcio 1.84.0:
unary_unary : Bearer TOK
unary_stream : <none>
stream_unary : <none>
stream_stream: <none>
Two controls, same harness:
- Passing the header at the call site (
stub.Method(req, metadata=(("authorization", …),))) reaches the server on all four shapes → per-call metadata is a reliable carrier. - An interceptor that mutates
details.metadatain place (details.metadata.add("authorization", …)on thegrpc.aio.Metadataobject it is given) also reaches the server on streaming calls → grpc.aio sends the original metadata object for streaming calls, not the one the interceptor returns.
Against a real deployment: put any bearer check in front of ate-env-api (we used nginx: if ($http_authorization != "Bearer <token>") { return 401; }), then Client(endpoint, auth_token=token): await client.create(...) succeeds, await env.shell("true") fails with UNAUTHENTICATED.
Expected vs actual
- Expected:
auth_tokenis sent on every RPC the client makes. - Actual: sent on unary-unary RPCs only;
StreamProcessOutput,ReadFile,WriteFile(and any future streaming RPC) are unauthenticated.
Workaround
Carry the bearer in the per-call metadata the client already attaches (Env._metadata() adds x-env-id / x-env-atespace to every call); we run a two-hunk patch that does this plus a guard in the interceptor so the header is not added twice. PR to follow.
Suggested fix
Env._metadata()(andProcess's use of it) appends("authorization", f"Bearer {token}")when the client was created withauth_token— this does not depend on interceptor behaviour._AuthInterceptor._injectskips when anauthorizationentry is already present (so unary calls do not send it twice).- Regression test in
clients/python/tests/test_client.py: an in-processgrpc.aioserver that echoesinvocation_metadata()["authorization"]for all four call shapes, asserting the bearer arrives on each (this is the script above, as a pytest).
An alternative that keeps the logic in the interceptor is to mutate details.metadata in place when it is a grpc.aio.Metadata; it works on 1.84.0 but relies on grpc.aio using the original object, which is the very behaviour that differs between call shapes, so the per-call carrier seems the safer choice. The grpc.aio asymmetry itself probably deserves an upstream report at grpc/grpc; I have not found an existing one.
- 主要语言
- Go
- 星标
- 71
- 派生
- 17
- 平均合并
- 21 小时 36 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 19
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
agent-substrate/env 的其他 Issue
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 42/100
agent-substrate/env#123 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 74/100
agent-substrate/env#121 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 42/100
agent-substrate/env#119 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
agent-substrate/env#118 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 57/100
agent-substrate/env#117 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 agent-substrate/env 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 66/100
riverqueue/river#1576 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
NFS StorageProvider renders a missing nfsSubDir as "<no value>"可能已有人在做 @ldming 今天认领。 未关闭kind/bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
apecloud/kubeblocks#11067 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
emersion/go-msgauth#87 ·
-
CLI: `describe <ns>.<table>` reports "namespace does not exist" when only the table is missing可能已有人在做 @Shruthirdy 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
apache/iceberg-go#2423 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
good first issue help wanted
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 85/100
mafzalkalwardev/mailforge#21 ·