fix(ci): contract cells and the mutants job fail intermittently with exit 4 (the server under test never comes up)
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 38/100
调研方向
Start with scripts/contract.sh around pick_port and the exit-4 paths, then read scripts/mutants.sh around mutant output and summary handling. Check .github/workflows/flake-hunt.yml and contract-cell.yml for the affected jobs, and the referenced AGENTS.md rules 2 and 8. Done means server logs are visible for non-killed mutants, startup failures are distinct from survivors, and repeated runs meet the agreed acceptance criteria.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Context
scripts/contract.sh exits 4 when the server under test never comes up: "target did not become healthy" or "target process exited early" (contract.sh:221 and :226). Contract cells and the mutants job then fail intermittently. Because gate requires every job, one of these turns the required check red, on main and on pull requests, for a reason that says nothing about the code.
scripts/mutants.sh runs each mutant as contract.sh ... > "$OUT/$name.out" 2>&1 (:53), so the server log that contract.sh prints on exit 4 goes into a file the job log does not show. Its summary then labels any non-kill SURVIVED or did not run (exit=..) (:33), so a server that never started reads like a surviving mutant, which is the finding the job exists to make.
Evidence
| Where | Job | What was seen |
|---|---|---|
push to main, b1c9d1f (run 40258128717) |
mutants |
native-memory engine + case-sensitive-search SURVIVED or did not run (exit=4, failed tests=) |
| #86, first run (42158481836) | mutants |
native-memory main + ignore-revoked ... (exit=4, failed tests=) |
| #86, first run | contract (worker-cf, bindings) |
Address already in use (127.0.0.1:34322), then target process exited early, exit 4 |
| #88, a throwaway pull request (42164639829) | mutants |
ignore-revoked again, exit=4; the other ten mutants were killed |
| #88 | contract (worker-cf, main) |
Address already in use (127.0.0.1:43896), exit 4 |
Of the nine pushes to main from ad07a79 to a206319, four failed (ae7dfa6, c0736a0, 7e4e858, b1c9d1f). For c0736a0, 7e4e858 and b1c9d1f the failing job was mutants ("Every mutant must be KILLED"); I did not inspect ae7dfa6. The last three pushes passed.
It is not a real surviving mutant: rerunning the failed jobs of #86 passed, #87's own run was green, and running the ignore-revoked mutant locally on the same tree gave a healthy server and a kill (49 passed, 5 failed, exit 101).
What is not known
- Why
mutantsfails: its log does not show the server's. Theworker-cfcells areAddress already in use. - Two hypotheses, neither tested. (1)
pick_port(contract.sh:72-85) picks a random port in 20000-49999 and checks only that nothing is listening on it, at the start of the script. The server binds long afterwards, after a build, so there is a window. (2) That range overlaps Linux's default ephemeral range (32768-60999), where a port can be held as the source port of an outgoing connection, whichlsof -sTCP:LISTENdoes not see but abindrefuses. macOS's ephemeral range starts at 49152, which would explain why it is never seen locally. ignore-revoked(the fourth mutant to start) has been the failing one on both pull-request runs wheremutantsfailed. That may be chance.
Proposal
- Make it diagnosable first: when a mutant is not killed, print the tail of
$OUT/$name.out(the server log) into the job log, and uploadtarget/mutantson failure. - Fix the port choice: take it from below the ephemeral range, or bind port 0 and read the port back, or retry the server start once on
address already in usewith a fresh port. That is a retry of the start, not of a test; AGENTS.md rule 2 forbids retrying tests, and this must not weaken it. - Separate "did not run" from "survived" in the
mutantssummary. An exit-4 mutant is not evidence that an assertion is vacuous, and a real survivor must stay unmistakable.
Acceptance criteria
- A mutant that is not killed shows its server log in the CI job log.
- The
mutantssummary reports a mutant whose server never started differently from one that survived, and a planted unkillable mutant still reportsSURVIVED(rule 8's control). -
flake-hunt.ymlon the affected cells (worker-cf main,worker-cf bindings), and a repeated run ofmutants, show no exit-4 failures over a number of runs agreed in this issue (30, say). - If hypothesis 1 or 2 is confirmed or ruled out, the finding is recorded here.
References
#86 (first run), #87, #88; scripts/contract.sh, scripts/mutants.sh; .github/workflows/flake-hunt.yml, contract-cell.yml; AGENTS.md rules 2 and 8.
- 主要语言
- Rust
- 星标
- 0
- 派生
- 0
- 平均合并
- 1 小时 35 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 67
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
aRustyDev/thrust 的其他 Issue
-
area:process prio:p1 type:security
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area:process prio:p1
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area:process prio:p1
难度 4/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 55/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area:process prio:p1
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 56/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area:app prio:p0 review:fable-2026-10-19
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
yara-x fails to build with rsa 0.10.0: unresolved import rsa::Pkcs1v15Sign可能已有人在做 @CfirTsabari 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 87/100
VirusTotal/yara-x#865 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
good first issue help wanted program
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
hffgzktbcc-blip/ounce-core#297 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
nautechsystems/nautilus_trader#5631 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 69/100
bytecodealliance/rustix#1736 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
longbridge/gpui-kit#3871 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复