Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Merging regression suites from engines

未关闭
#153 13 条评论 1 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
30/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
冷清
技术栈
wasm
领域
testing-qa

调研方向

首先检查 Wizard 和其他 engine 中现有的 .wast 回归测试套件,以及当前仓库中测试的表示方式。检查候选镜像测试是否准确体现 Wasm 3.0 规范。完成的标准是项目就导入和维护合并后的测试套件形成一致认可的方法。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

In some backroom discussions, I've raised the possibility of putting together the union of all the regression suites that are accumulating in various engines. For example, Wizard has thousands of .wast files that are either new tests, regression tests for old bugs, or expansions of spec tests. Due to the magic of .wast, all such tests pass on the Wasm 3.0 spec interpreter (yay!), so I think these could also be useful to other engines. Similarly, other engines' accumulated regression tests have been useful for Wizard as well.

I wonder if there is appetite for duplicating all of the .wast tests out there into this repo? We could do this manually at first, letting engine maintainers push new tests here via PRs. In the future we could also consider scripts to pull in said tests.

There are maybe some issues to discuss, such as making sure that tests mirrored or duplicated here actually do accurately represent the spec, but I think this could be good for the ecosystem.

Thoughts?

@fitzgen @eqrion @kmiller68 @tlively @cfallin

主要语言
WebAssembly
星标
249
派生
65
平均合并
40 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
4

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

WebAssembly/testsuite 的其他 Issue

查看 WebAssembly/testsuite 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Testing & QA Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。