On-demand ordered windows wait on a boundary tie request even when ordering by the collection key
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 18/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- typescript
调研方向
Start in packages/db/src/query/live/ordered-source-loader.ts, around the sequencing at L745-L752 and the boundary request at L880, then look at buildCursorCurrent in packages/db/src/utils/cursor.ts. The repro.mjs script in the issue shows the two extra loadSubset calls per window step. Done means one loadSubset per step when the leading order term is unique, without changing behaviour for tied keys.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Describe the bug
An on-demand live query ordered by the collection key (getKey: row => row.id and .orderBy(({ item }) => item.id)) sends an extra loadSubset after every ordered page. It has where: <query where> AND id = <last loaded id>, with no orderBy and no limit. id is unique, so this request can only return the row that was just loaded.
Since 0.9.0 (#1797), the ordered source loader waits for it: ordered → boundary → more. Each window step therefore costs two sequential round trips instead of one, and setWindow() resolves only after the boundary request returns. In 0.6.14 a window step was a single cursor request.
With the Electric adapter, the following cursor request also sends cursor.whereCurrent (id = <last loaded id>) alongside whereFrom. Each step therefore makes two requests whose only result is a row the collection already holds.
Reproduction
A plain on-demand collection with a logging loadSubset and 50 ms of simulated latency. No adapter is involved. The script is in the details below.
@tanstack/[email protected]:
4- 57 ms page limit=5 -> 5 rows
57- 109 ms unordered limit=null -> 1 rows (list = 'a' AND id = 'row-004')
413- 466 ms cursor limit=5 -> 6 rows
466- 518 ms unordered limit=null -> 1 rows (list = 'a' AND id = 'row-009')
setWindow({ limit: 10 }) took 107 ms
@tanstack/[email protected], same script:
3- 60 ms page limit=5 -> 5 rows
363- 416 ms cursor limit=5 -> 6 rows
setWindow({ limit: 10 }) took 55 ms
repro.mjs (run with node repro.mjs next to an installed @tanstack/db)
import { BTreeIndex, createCollection, createLiveQueryCollection, eq, parseWhereExpression } from '@tanstack/db'
const LATENCY_MS = 50
const serverRows = Array.from({ length: 20 }, (_, i) => ({ id: `row-${String(i).padStart(3, '0')}`, list: 'a' }))
const toPredicate = where =>
where === undefined
? () => true
: parseWhereExpression(where, {
handlers: {
eq: ([f], v) => r => r[f] === v,
gt: ([f], v) => r => r[f] > v,
isNull: ([f]) => r => r[f] === null,
isUndefined: ([f]) => r => r[f] === undefined,
and: (...ps) => r => ps.every(p => p(r)),
or: (...ps) => r => ps.some(p => p(r)),
},
})
const select = (where, limit) =>
serverRows.filter(toPredicate(where)).sort((a, b) => (a.id < b.id ? -1 : 1)).slice(0, limit)
const and2 = (a, b) => ({ type: 'func', name: 'and', args: [a, b] })
const t0 = Date.now()
const calls = []
const items = createCollection({
id: 'items',
getKey: row => row.id,
syncMode: 'on-demand',
defaultIndexType: BTreeIndex,
defaultStringCollation: { stringSort: 'lexical' },
sync: {
sync: ({ begin, write, commit, markReady }) => {
markReady()
return {
loadSubset: async options => {
const call = {
start: Date.now() - t0,
kind: options.cursor ? 'cursor' : options.orderBy ? 'page' : 'unordered',
limit: options.limit ?? null,
}
calls.push(call)
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, LATENCY_MS))
// Like the Electric adapter: a cursor request loads whereCurrent ties plus whereFrom rows.
const rows = options.cursor
? [
...select(and2(options.where, options.cursor.whereCurrent)),
...select(and2(options.where, options.cursor.whereFrom), options.limit),
]
: select(options.where, options.limit)
begin()
for (const row of rows) write({ type: 'insert', value: row })
commit()
call.end = Date.now() - t0
call.rows = rows.length
},
}
},
},
})
items.createIndex(row => row.id, {
indexType: BTreeIndex,
options: { compareOptions: { ...items.compareOptions, direction: 'asc', nulls: 'last' } },
})
const windowed = createLiveQueryCollection(q =>
q
.from({ item: items })
.where(({ item }) => eq(item.list, 'a'))
.orderBy(({ item }) => item.id, { direction: 'asc', nulls: 'last' })
.limit(5)
)
await windowed.preload()
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 300))
const calledAt = Date.now() - t0
await windowed.utils.setWindow({ offset: 0, limit: 10 })
const resolvedAt = Date.now() - t0
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 300))
for (const call of calls) {
console.log(`${String(call.start).padStart(4)}-${String(call.end).padStart(4)} ms ${call.kind.padEnd(9)} limit=${String(call.limit).padEnd(4)} -> ${call.rows} rows`)
}
console.log(`setWindow({ limit: 10 }) took ${resolvedAt - calledAt} ms`)
Impact
We backfill a large on-demand Electric collection in 1,000-row windows by calling setWindow repeatedly, ordered by id. In our E2E benchmark (280 ms request latency, medians of 3 runs), the only change between the two runs was the upgrade from 0.6.14 to 0.13.0:
| 0.6.14 | 0.13.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 30k rows: sequential round trips | 31 | 63 |
| 30k rows: time to load all rows | 12.9 s | 23.6 s |
| 70k rows plus dependent output queries: time to load all rows | 73 s | 114 s |
In production, every 1,000-row page also showed both id = <last id> requests, each returning the one row already loaded.
Expected behavior
When the leading order term is unique, a window step needs one loadSubset. No row can tie with the boundary, so neither the boundary request nor cursor.whereCurrent can add anything.
Possible approaches
Core can't infer from a getKey function that id is unique, so this probably needs an explicit signal. Ideas:
- An opt-in that marks the leading order term as unique, for example a collection option naming the key path, or
unique: trueon the order-by options. With it:loadBoundarywould skip the tie request;- adapters would leave out
cursor.whereCurrent, perhaps via a flag onLoadSubsetOptions/CursorExpressions.
- Independent of uniqueness: don't hold the next window step or
setWindow()resolution on the boundary request, so it costs no added latency. That was the 0.6.14 behavior, where the tie travelled with the cursor request.
Code references
- Sequencing, 0.13.0:
ordered-source-loader.tsL745–L752, and the boundary request at L880. The same sequencing is still onmain(0.14.0) at L774–L779. - Equality boundary:
utils/cursor.tsbuildCursorCurrent. - Electric adapter, both cursor parts:
electric.tsL771–L797. - Related: #960 (separate
whereFrom/whereCurrent), #1797 (sequential boundary step), #1893 (leading-column continuation with tie expansion), and RFC #1657, which proposed appending the primary key as a total-order tie-breaker.
Versions
@tanstack/db0.13.0; the same code is onmain/ 0.14.0.@tanstack/electric-db-collection0.5.9.@tanstack/react-db0.5.8.- Node 24; also seen in Chrome in production.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 4k
- 派生
- 277
- 平均合并
- 17 小时 40 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 223
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
TanStack/db 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Garbage collection cleans up a collection while one of its transactions is still persisting可能已有人在做 @Nabil372 于 1 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 35/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
persistedCollectionOptions without a schema can't be passed to createCollection (follow-up to #1452)未关闭
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
openremote/openremote#3487 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
coollabsio/jean#867 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
ehmpathy/rhachet-roles-bhuild#616 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
📘 Docs supabase/cli
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug(cli): theme file home-directory check uses startsWith (sibling dirs pass, Windows casing fails)未关闭area/core kind/bug priority/p2 status/bot-triaged
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
google-gemini/gemini-cli#29955 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复