`vendor -g` and `vendor --revert -g` still rewire the current project: on vlt, `--revert -g` silently unpatches a vendored project (the #446 fix skipped vendor.rs)
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
Start with crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/vendor.rs at the manifest-driven vendoring path around line 810 and run_revert around line 3119. Compare their global-scope handling with project_state_in_scope and global_mode_conflict in commands/mod.rs:44, then run the supplied vendor -g and vendor --revert -g reproductions. Done means global commands no longer modify the project's lockfile, vendor directory, or ledger and produce the documented usage behavior.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
[agent] Found by the scheduled vlt bug-hunt routine (ledger #307).
Summary
PR #446 (fixing #436 / #445) made every -g / --global-prefix run leave the cwd project's hosted pins and vendored wiring alone, but only in get, scan, apply, rollback and remove. The standalone vendor command was not changed, and it ignores global scope completely:
vendor --revert -grun inside a vendored project reverts the project's vendoring:vlt-lock.jsongoes back to the upstream registry entry and.socket/vendor/is deleted. It exits 0 and the global copy is untouched. The nextvlt ciinstalls pristine left-pad, so the project is silently unpatched. This is the #445 failure again, reached throughvendorinstead ofrollback.vendor -grun inside a project whose.socket/manifest.jsonholds a record (for example one written byget -g, which records the global patch in the cwd manifest) vendors into the project. It creates.socket/vendor/npm/<uuid>/…, rewiresvlt-lock.jsonto afile~.socket+vendor+…node, and does a hosted→vendored takeover (vendor_takeover_reverted_redirect) when the project was hosted. It exits 0.SOCKET_GLOBAL=1/SOCKET_GLOBAL_PREFIXbehave the same as the flags.
Impact
A user who patched a global tool (get -g) and then runs vendor --revert -g or vendor -g from inside their project gets their project's lockfile rewritten, with exit 0 and no warning. With --revert -g the project is unpatched on the next frozen install. This is the same class of damage as #445, which was rated p1.
Expected (CLI_CONTRACT.md)
Global scope never touches the project's state (v5.0). A
--global/--global-prefixrun that starts inside a project acts on the global installs only. The--cwdproject's hosted pins and vendor ledger are not its target …
scan and get with --mode vendored under -g are a usage error (exit 2: "global installs have no project lockfile … to wire vendored artifacts into"). vendor -g should be refused the same way, or be a no-op on the project. vendor --revert -g must not revert the project's ledger entries.
Repro (Linux, vlt 1.3.3; a local mock registry plus patch API, as in the ledger)
G=$PWD/gprefix; npm install -g --prefix $G --registry $REG [email protected]
mkdir proj && cd proj
echo '{"name":"app","version":"1.0.0","dependencies":{"left-pad":"1.3.0"}}' > package.json
echo '{"config":{"registries":{"npm":"'$REG'"}}}' > vlt.json
vlt install
socket-patch scan --mode vendored --yes --json # rc 0, project vendored
cp vlt-lock.json lock.vendored
socket-patch get pkg:npm/[email protected] -g --global-prefix $G/lib/node_modules --yes --json # rc 0, global patched
socket-patch vendor --revert -g --global-prefix $G/lib/node_modules --yes --json # rc 0
cmp vlt-lock.json lock.vendored # differs: back to the registry entry; .socket/vendor gone
rm -rf node_modules && vlt ci --allow-scripts :scripts
node -p "require('left-pad')" # pristine
The vendor -g variant: skip the scan --mode vendored step, then run get … -g followed by vendor -g --global-prefix …. vlt-lock.json gains "file~_d left-pad": "prod file:./.socket/vendor/npm/<uuid>/left-pad-1.3.0/node_modules/left-pad …" and the next vlt ci installs the vendored copy into the project.
Actual vs expected
| Command (inside the project, global copy patched) | Expected | Actual |
|---|---|---|
vendor --revert -g (flag or SOCKET_GLOBAL=1) |
project's vendoring kept | project's vendoring reverted, rc 0, vlt ci → pristine |
vendor -g |
exit 2 usage error (as scan -g --mode vendored), or no project change |
vendors into .socket/vendor, rewires vlt-lock.json, hosted→vendored takeover, rc 0 |
OS × version
| OS | vlt 1.0.10 | vlt 1.2.0 | vlt 1.3.3 | npm control (package-lock) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | repro (vendor -g and --revert -g) |
repro | repro (2/2 runs, flag and env) | repro (vendor --revert -g unwinds the npm project too) |
| macOS / Windows | untested (no probe branch this run) | untested | untested | — |
The logic doesn't depend on the package manager: it reproduces against npm too. I'm filing it under vlt because that's where I found it, as with #445.
First bad
Release 4.0.0 predates vlt support. On main, vendor has never consulted global scope. #446 (551c362) fixed the sibling commands but left vendor.rs untouched, so this is a gap in that fix rather than a regression. Tested on main 61cfb9b.
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/vendor.rs:665: only the manifest-less eject path checksis_global(). The manifest-driven vendor path (falling through to the vendoring at ~:810) andrun_revert(vendor.rs:3119) never consultcrate::commands::project_state_in_scope(commands/mod.rs:44) orglobal_mode_conflict.
- 主要语言
- Rust
- 星标
- 8
- 派生
- 0
- 平均合并
- 1 天 31 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 151
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
SocketDev/socket-patch 的其他 Issue
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:pipenv priority:p1
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#744 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:cargo priority:p2
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#651 · 3 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:composer priority:p2
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 90/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#515 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
A report-only `scan -g` tells you to run `socket-patch scan --mode agent [PATHS]` without `-g`, so following the hint scans the cwd project instead of the global install可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p1
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#464 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 SocketDev/socket-patch 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
enhancement
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
zcashlabs/thus-spoke-zakura#153 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
topgrade-rs/topgrade#2395 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
app bug windows-os
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 67/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk#7217 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
editor good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
funnyboy-roks/inq#54 ·