Historical view redesign / 历史数据视图重新设计
维护者通常 1 天内回复
@functionstackx 已经在做这个了。
开始于 2026年5月5日。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 技术栈
- typescript
调研方向
Start by reviewing the current historical data view, including GPU comparison, date-range and intermediate-date selection, shortcut buttons, URL state, and existing analytics behavior. Produce mocks, a prototype, wireframes, or an annotated walkthrough plus a short rationale; done means the proposal addresses repeat and first-time users, reproduces the exact view through shared URLs, and measures the new selection affordances.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Feedback and analytics suggest the current historical view is hard to use. Many users select a GPU to compare but then struggle with the date range and intermediate-date selection, and the date-selection shortcut buttons are largely ignored. Come up with a design for a better implementation.
The priority audience is technical users who use the site frequently and want to move fast through repeated comparisons, without alienating first-time visitors who don't yet know the data model.
Requirements
- A fast, low-friction flow for repeat users. Picking a GPU or GPUs and exploring their history over time should take few clicks, with sensible defaults and keyboard-friendly affordances where it helps.
- Approachable enough that a first-time visitor can pick a GPU and land on a meaningful curve-over-time view without having to fully understand the date model up front.
- Date range and intermediate-date selection should feel obvious; the existing shortcut buttons should either be redesigned to actually get used or replaced with something better.
- Whatever shape the new selection takes, it must roundtrip through the URL so shared links reproduce the exact view.
- Consider splitting into a
latest dataview tab andhistorical dataview tab? - Analytics events on the new selection affordances so we can measure whether the redesign actually moved usage.
Deliverable
A design (mocks, prototype, wireframes, or annotated walkthrough) plus a short writeup of the thinking: what's wrong with the current flow, what you changed, and why. This one is fully up to you but ideally users familiar with the current layout should not struggle too hard with the updated layout.
中文说明
用户反馈和数据分析表明当前的历史数据视图不够好用。许多用户选择 GPU 进行比较后，在日期范围和中间日期选择上遇到困难，日期快捷按钮几乎无人使用。需要重新设计该功能。
目标受众优先考虑频繁使用网站的技术用户，同时不疏远初次访问者。要求包括：低摩擦的操作流程、直观的日期选择、URL 状态保持（以支持分享链接）、以及埋点分析事件以衡量改版效果。
交付物为设计方案（原型/线框图/标注说明）及简要设计思路说明。
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 49
- 派生
- 22
- 平均合并
- 7 小时 50 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 243
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX-app 的其他 Issue
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 52/100
SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX-app#1500 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 50/100
SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX-app#1185 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
diff/hard p2
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 45/100
SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX-app#270 · 5 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX-app 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
e2e-failure ready-to-code
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 82/100
redhat-developer/rhdh-plugin-export-overlays#4616 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 66/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
ai-handle
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
nextlevelbuilder/dewee-web-v2#73 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
backend bug good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
PoCInnovation/Distribox#255 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复