meta(distributed): multi-node and multi-GPU execution — backend API, IGG halo, tests, slab adjoint
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 25/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- julia
调研方向
Start with sub-issue #47 and the existing _dist_scatter!/_dist_reduce! seam, then read #46, #30, and #77 to understand the backend, multi-node, test, and slab-adjoint work. Check test/multigpu and test/mdla_gpu.jl; done means the listed sub-issues are addressed while preserving transpose invariants, one halo exchange per application, prepare-time coefficient exchange, and no new core dependency.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Umbrella for everything that makes a CartesianGrid operator run across more than one device or node. MDLA (single-node multi-GPU, CUDA-only) is done behind the _dist_scatter! / _dist_reduce! seam; what remains is the API to choose a backend, the multi-node backend itself, and the tests that prove ≥3 partitions. The perf gap on the slab transpose (#77) is closed.
Status (2026-09-30): #77 done via PR #91; #30's fold-in no longer waits on #47/#46; one open DESIGN question on ghost layout (from #81).
Sub-issues, in order
- #47 — explicit backend selection (
AbstractDistributedBackend,MDLABackend,IGGBackend), mirroringAbstractJVPBackend. First: it is the entry point #46 must implement against, and today a second extension definingprepare_distributed(::AbstractOperator, ::Integer)would be ambiguous. - #46 — ImplicitGlobalGrid halo backend for multi-node. Carries the κ-ghost note from the PR #66 review (the IGG backend owes one setup-time exchange of the coefficient's
Interfaceghosts) and, from #52, the comm/compute overlap idea: launch the interior stencil, run_exchange_storage!concurrently, then finish the boundary strips. Overlap is not to be built before a blocking exchange is measured. - #30 — instantiate
test/multigpu(≥3-GPU distributed tests). Upstream blockers cleared; also lifts themin(NGPUS_MDLA, 2)caps intest/mdla_gpu.jl. Not gated on #47/#46: the fold-in exercises the existing MDLA backend only, so includingtest/multigpu/mdla_3partition.jlbehind the existingNGPUS_MP >= 3self-skip and lifting the caps can land in parallel with 1–2. - ~~#77 — slab
Diffusionadjoint runs the generic masked gather at ~5.7× the forward stencil. Becomes a per-iteration cost the moment distributed reverse-mode AD lands.~~ **Done** — PR #91 (interior stencil + ghost-plane gather for the slabDiffusionadjoint).
Open design question
- Ghost layout: inline padding vs. ghosts beside the interior (from #81's addendum, Q3). Should
Fieldkeep ghosts inline in a padded array, or store the interior contiguously with ghosts held in separate face buffers? Face buffers are what MPI wants regardless — inline ghosts have to be packed into them — and would let a solver vector alias the interior and fill faces in O(surface) instead of two O(volume) staging passes. The cost lands on operator bodies: inline ghosts are what let one broadcast over shifted slices be correct at every cell (the "leaf bodies stay array-level" rule), whereas ghosts-beside splits each sweep into an interior core plus up to 3ᴺ−1 boundary regions, per leaf, per BC kind, and again for every declared adjoint and AD path. The one existing data point islaplacian_7pt_noflux(DESIGN.md §4), a flat halo-free primitive kept as a separate body, pinned to homogeneous no-flux, and locked to the halo-based leaf by a parity test. Outcome: if inline is right, an alternatives-considered note in DESIGN.md so it stops resurfacing; if not, its own issue.
Invariants that bind every sub-issue
_dist_reduce!must remain the exact transpose of_dist_scatter!across ranks, including the∂/∂κscatter-add — this is the part with no equivalent in the IGG/ParallelStencil ecosystem.- One halo exchange per operator application; coefficient exchanges belong at
preparetime. - No new core dependency: MPI/IGG live in
ext/.
—
🤖 Claude struck #77 off this list with great satisfaction.
claude-opus-5-5[1m] (high) · claude-code 2.1.285 · unreviewed
- 主要语言
- Julia
- 星标
- 3
- 派生
- 1
- 平均合并
- 1 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 1
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
RallypointOne/MatrixFreeOperators.jl 的其他 Issue
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
-
enhancement
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
-
performance
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 45/100
-
performance
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
-
enhancement
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
查看 RallypointOne/MatrixFreeOperators.jl 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
lux
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
JuliaGraphs/GraphNeuralNetworks.jl#732 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
erfinv(::Float16) and erfcinv(::Float16) are wrong for abs(x) <= 0.75 (erfinv(Float16(0)) == 0.2201)未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
JuliaMath/SpecialFunctions.jl#571 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 67/100