Reserve and adequacy constraints

未关闭
#2,096 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 2 天内回复

@FabianHofmann 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2026年11月4日。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python
领域
backend, databases

调研方向

Read the linked sub-issues #1542, #1729, and #1490, then compare PyPSA's constraint APIs with the GenX formulation cited here. The issue defines a broad goal but names no files or tests; first identify where component constraints are built. Done means eligible components can contribute spare capacity to reserve and adequacy constraints, including the stated reserve-market and resource adequacy use cases.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

gap optimization reliability & uncertainty

PyPSA has no native representation of operating reserves or capacity adequacy. Reserve requirements must be hand-built as custom constraints.

Goal: Provide constraints for reserve and adequacy requirements, where eligible components contribute out of their spare capacity. This supports reserve-market approximations and resource adequacy assessment, such as capacity margins or limits on expected energy not served (EENS) and loss of load probability (LOLP). The reserve implementation follows the established GenX formulation.

References: GenX.jl, Costa et al. (2025)

Sub-issues: #1542, #1729, #1490


Generated by Claude Code

主要语言
Python
星标
2.2k
派生
732
平均合并
3 天 59 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
58

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

PyPSA/PyPSA 的其他 Issue

查看 PyPSA/PyPSA 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。