[BUG] A request the HTTP Listener rejects leaves no record anywhere
维护者通常 2 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 42/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- java
- 领域
- backend, observability
调研方向
Start in the HTTP Listener receiver, HttpReceiver, where the existing ErrorEvent dispatch sites are, and read the Jetty hook HttpChannel.Listener.onRequestFailure that the issue identifies as the only one reporting rejected requests. Reproduce with the curl command in the issue (431 with a 9000-byte header) and check the Events tab and logs/mirth.log. Done means a rejected request produces an Events entry naming the listener, and ideally the 400 and 414 cases are covered too; conf/log4j2.properties is also involved in the logging side. The issue leaves the event design open, so confirm the approach with maintainers first.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Describe the bug
This is the HTTP Listener source connector. When the Jetty server it runs rejects a request before the channel sees it, nothing is recorded: no message, no event, nothing in mirth.log. Same for a header that is too large (431), a URI that is too long (414) and a malformed header (400). Reproducible every time.
To Reproduce
- Deploy an HTTP Listener with the default Request Header Size (8192).
curl -H "X-Big: $(head -c 9000 /dev/zero | tr '\0' a)" http://localhost:<port>/- The client gets
431 Request Header Fields Too Large. - Look at the dashboard, the Events tab and
logs/mirth.log.
Expected behavior
An operator can see that the listener turned a request away, and why.
Actual behavior
Nothing anywhere. No event is written. Jetty logs a WARN, but conf/log4j2.properties sets rootLogger = ERROR with no Jetty logger, so the line is dropped.
Environment
OIE 4.6.0 (Linux tarball), OpenJDK 17.0.20.1, Jetty 9.4.57. main has the same Jetty version and the same log4j2.properties root logger.
Workaround(s)
Add to conf/log4j2.properties and restart:
logger.jettyParser.name = org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser
logger.jettyParser.level = WARN
A 431 then writes WARN ... org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser: Header is too large 8193>8192 to mirth.log, and a 414 writes URI is too large >8192. The line names no channel, port or client, a 400 for a malformed header still logs nothing, and there is still no event.
Additional context
Which Jetty hooks see a rejected request, checked on 9.4.57:
HttpChannel.Listener.onRequestFailurefires withBadMessageException: 431(register withconnector.addBean(...)). It is the only one that reports the failure.ErrorHandler.handlenever fires on this path.RequestLog.log,onResponseBeginandonCompletefire but report status 200, so a request log would record the rejection as a success.
HttpReceiver already dispatches ErrorEvents at four sites, so an Events entry from onRequestFailure would fit. Jetty throws BadMessageException for the 400 and 414 cases too, so the same hook should cover them (not tested).
- 主要语言
- Java
- 星标
- 227
- 派生
- 81
- 平均合并
- 3 天 6 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 15
环境准备
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
OpenIntegrationEngine/engine 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
OpenIntegrationEngine/engine#485 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
OpenIntegrationEngine/engine#478 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
OpenIntegrationEngine/engine#355 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
OpenIntegrationEngine/engine#347 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
OpenIntegrationEngine/engine#313 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
查看 OpenIntegrationEngine/engine 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
[Bug] dubbo.protocol.triple.max-message-size is only read from OS environment variables可能已有人在做 @CCCLL 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 64/100
hierynomus/sshj#1070 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
intellij-elixir/intellij-elixir#4492 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 77/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
quarkiverse/quarkus-openapi-generator#1796 · 1 条评论 ·