Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[Docs][CI] Ensure docfx links stay valid, prepare future xml API docs options, keep docs simple maintainable and introduce CI integration for this

未关闭
#846 6 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
csharp, github-actions

调研方向

首先查看 docfx.json、commitlint.yml、现有的 GitHub Actions 工作流以及相关 issue #845。该 issue 包含多个关于 CI、分支、标签和 API 文档的可行方案,但范围尚未确定。要视为完成,需要达成一致的设计,并通过有效的验证确保生成的文档链接仍然有效。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

docs improvement

This Docs/CI Enhancement targets to keep pre / development Branch Docs + Releases API:

  • cleanly seperated on their branch (intellisense/markdown suggestion support)
  • allow valid API docs and source code linking in docs

[!IMPORTANT]
docfx docs generation will fail completly or produce invalid Links if we include the metadata step on a branch that doesn't include the to be linked file or src code!

To Ensure the latest docs PR (find linked in Additional Information Section) will not fall on our toes in the future or cause unnessesary additional (automate-able) work for us, we should consider:

  • GH Action for PR's md docs changes: If there are only md docs changes (our current build not includes API docs) This should get triggered and add a PR for maybe cherry picking those commits from development onto master? but this will potentially be causing invalid links as soon as we step on to use API docs!

  • Enhance/Ensure proper Commit Labels: We should then explicitly keep our commits cleanly seperated and scoped/categorized properly, which would include such relevant changes. It's possible for the commitlint.yml from what I readed by now, to add more allowed labels or similar but we should have this discussed and decided properly, what we want and maybe find ways to do this, which I maybe did possibly not consider here.

  • GH Action: Ensure DocFx correct build for API metadata: Pay Attention as soon as we might want to use generate xml docs from any source code via metadata!
    Produce and add API Docs after changes on non-master-merge PR branches:

    • create the API them in this case after their source branch got a relevant PR merge
    • have all docfx docs produced and merged to master (?) or @andrerav what do you think of reusing the gh-pages branch for our docs product then 🤔 ? possibly this is the cleanest way...
  • Review & Add DocFx Content Setup for API version support:

    I havn't been successfull by now with the output / dest settings in docfx.json which are linted as depreciated but I see many others still use them and I think this is required to have a proper xml API output control for this 🤔

    • Possibly I will need to ask the docfx team for help, to come to a working setup, but my targeted idea would be something like this in our github.io web docs then:

      image

Additional Information

  • #845
    @DocSvartz @stagep @andrerav
主要语言
C#
星标
5.2k
派生
411
平均合并
1 天 8 小时
30 天内合并 PR
4

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

MapsterMapper/Mapster 的其他 Issue

查看 MapsterMapper/Mapster 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C# Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。