Test for missing inverse relationships
@lgebhardt 已经在做这个了。
开始于 2023年11月20日。
评估
这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。
描述
This issue is a (choose one):
- Problem/bug report.
- Feature request.
- Request for support. Note: Please try to avoid submitting issues for support requests. Use Gitter instead.
Checklist before submitting:
- I've searched for an existing issue.
- I've asked my question on Gitter and have not received a satisfactory answer.
- I've included a complete bug report template. This step helps us and allows us to see the bug without trying to reproduce the problem from your description. It helps you because you will frequently detect if it's a problem specific to your project.
- The feature I'm asking for is compliant with the JSON:API spec.
Description
A way to detect missing inverse relationships is needed. I would like to be able to add a test to a project to ensure no new missing relationship conditions have been added. Should also account for intentionally having a missing inverse relationship, probably with a flag on the primary relationship.
There are probably other relationship tests we could add, so we should consider how to best handle these in a consistent manner.
- 主要语言
- Ruby
- 星标
- 2.3k
- 派生
- 546
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
JSONAPI-Resources/jsonapi-resources 的其他 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 50/100
JSONAPI-Resources/jsonapi-resources#1488 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 42/100
JSONAPI-Resources/jsonapi-resources#1479 · 2 条评论 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 30/100
JSONAPI-Resources/jsonapi-resources#1477 · 3 条评论 · 1 个 reaction ·
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 45/100
查看 JSONAPI-Resources/jsonapi-resources 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
riscv/riscv-unified-db#2626 ·
-
Component: GLib
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
ds-drift
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
we-promise/sure#3693 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
simp/pupmod-simp-simp#395 ·