P3 tokenomics: token utility, emission schedule, supply policy, treasury (P3-5.1/5.2)
维护者通常 1 天内回复
@robertocarlous 已经在做这个了。
开始于 2026年7月21日。
评估
这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。
描述
Part of the P3 mechanism-design push (#36).
Summary
Turn DIN from a devnet utility/staking token into a credible protocol asset. Today DinToken mints only via DinCoordinator.depositAndMint (fixed dinPerEth rate, owner-withdrawable ETH, no cap, no burn, no emission, no treasury).
Scope (from MECHANISM_DESIGN §7)
- Utility / demand sinks: staking (primary), DIN-denominated fees, reward-pool deposits, governance weight (P5+ hook only)
- Emission contract (P3-5.2): per-GI reward subsidy on a diminishing schedule — ✅ geometric decay per epoch confirmed, GI-lifecycle-tied inflation guard confirmed.
MAX_SUPPLY: ✅ resolved as deliberately open/dynamic for now, not a hard cap at freeze time (supply governed by issuance vs. burn; hard cap possible later via governance) depositAndMint: effectively an unlimited mint at an admin-set rate — ✅ Resolved: keep active (faucet mode) on DevNet; cap on testnet; retire on mainnet, replaced by either a proper on-ramp/ICO or a validator-airdrop program rewarding testnet participants — both kept open, final model TBD; route deposited ETH backing to treasury instead ofowner()withdrawal- Burn sinks: ✅ Resolved: explicit 50% slashed-stake burn share; fee-burn fraction from both on-chain protocol fees and validator network fees (dual sources), start at 0%, keep the hook
- Treasury: dedicated address/contract receiving network fee split, slashed-stake share, deposit backing; DAO-controlled spend
- Modelling before contracts (P3-5.2): simulate whether pool + emission produce stable validator income at target / 10× / 0.1× participation — wrong answers are expensive post-audit
Open decisions (→ tokenomics discussion)
- Emission schedule shape and
MAX_SUPPLY(MECHANISM_DESIGN §9, decision 5) — ✅ partially resolved, see above - Reward split percentages (decision 3, simulated in P3-5.2) — still open, not addressed
depositAndMintcap/retirement plan (decision 8 — flag before audit) — ✅ resolved, see above
Status (2026-07-21): the above resolutions are from Abraham (CEO, white-paper author) via Slack; recorded in MECHANISM_DESIGN.md §9 and tokenomics-design.md §6. Note the fee-denomination recommendation elsewhere in this doc's sibling issue (#43) is also revised — see there.
Design sources
MECHANISM_DESIGN §7 · issues/tokenomics.md · whitepaper-summary §5, §8 gap item 8 (white paper: Eth2-style decreasing inflation + fee-funded burn)
Roadmap anchors: P3-5.1 (token utility design), P3-5.2 (emission & distribution model), P3-DOC5 (tokenomics paper)
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 4
- 派生
- 7
- 平均合并
- 3 天 58 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 39
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南，环境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet 的其他 Issue
-
bug good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#295 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
ROADMAP.md: refresh "What is still open for P3" (several items were fixed in October)可能已有人在做 @umermjd11 于 2 天前认领。 未关闭documentation good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#285 · 已指派 1 人 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
good first issue help wanted
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#277 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#266 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Approved documentation
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#248 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
Graphify-Labs/graphify#4860 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
:bug: Bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
scikit-image/scikit-image#8377 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Ingredient import validation accepts negative nutrient values and NaN可能已有人在做 @LukeSekai 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
wger-project/wger#2564 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
apache/ponymail-foal#351 ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 4 天内回复