Source field becomes incorrect when ingesting netflow data to graylog docker container

未关闭
#709 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
30/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
docker, java
领域
networking

调研方向

从 Netflow 输入入口开始,使用文档中的 Docker 设置、Graylog 4.0.1 和重启容器来复现 source 字段的变更。跟踪重启前后 Netflow source 的记录方式;当记录继续显示源 probe 的 IP,而不是 Docker 网络网关的 IP 时,即表示完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

bug triaged

Expected Behavior

Source field should be correct and show the IP of the Netflow source

Current Behavior

TLDR: In graylog container, something triggers the netflow input to switch from storing the correct source field to storing the internal gateway IP for the docker network the container is in.

I'm running graylog, elasticsearch and mongo as containers from a docker-compose file more or less the same as that given in the documentation.
I have a Netflow input set up, override_source is not set. Into that I am feeding Netflow v9 records from two different systems, running different netflow probe software (a Linux box running netprobe and a BSD box running softflowd). All is well, and the data is correct. At some point, something happens, and the source field in the data changes from the IP of the netflow probe machine to the IP of the internal gateway of the docker network. This happens to data from both netflow probe machines.

I believe from a small amount of testing that the 'something' that triggers it is the restart of the docker container, whether by the host updating docker or stopping/starting the container. That certainly seemed to cause it to start to use the docker host's IP as the source rather than the actual IPs but there may be other triggers.
Once in that state, restarting the probe software on the remote boxes seems to be the only way to get it to start logging the correct source field again.

The issue does seem to be specific to the Netflow module, other inputs (beats, syslog) are working fine. I can't currently test whether there's any way to trigger the same issue on a non-container version.

Context

It's problematic if I want to search based on which box sent netflow data, or to apply pipeline rules to normalize the data coming from the two sources if I relied on that obvious field to tell the sources apart.

Your Environment

  • Graylog Version: Graylog 4.0.1+6a0cc0b (docker container tag graylog/graylog:4.0)
  • Java Version: 1.8.0_275
  • Elasticsearch Version: 7.10.1 (docker container tag elasticsearch-oss:7.10.1)
  • MongoDB Version: 3 (docker container tag mongo:3)
  • Operating System: Ubuntu 18.04
  • Browser version:
  • Docker version: 20.10.2
主要语言
Java
星标
17
派生
13
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

Graylog2/graylog-plugin-integrations 的其他 Issue

查看 Graylog2/graylog-plugin-integrations 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。