MongoCheckpointStore leaks a batching pipeline on every GetLastCheckpoint call
维护者通常 7 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 48/100
调研方向
Start with src/Mongo/src/Eventuous.Projections.MongoDB/MongoCheckpointStore.cs and trace how GetLastCheckpoint, StoreCheckpoint, and GetSubject handle subjects, batching, and errors. Then read EventSubscriptionWithCheckpoint.GetCheckpoint and the checkpoint store registration to understand call frequency and lifetime. Add a regression test for repeated reads or resubscription, then verify that checkpoint writes remain ordered and failures do not stop later writes.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
MongoCheckpointStore.GetLastCheckpoint is not a pure read. Every call builds a new Subject with its own Rx batching pipeline and overwrites the previous one for that checkpoint ID, without completing or disposing it:
public async ValueTask<EventuousCheckpoint> GetLastCheckpoint(string checkpointId, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default) {
// ... read the stored checkpoint ...
_subjects[checkpointId] = GetSubject(); // replaces whatever was there
return checkpoint;
}
readonly Dictionary<string, Subject<EventuousCheckpoint>> _subjects = new();
Subject<EventuousCheckpoint> GetSubject() {
var subject = new Subject<EventuousCheckpoint>();
// ... Buffer(interval, size) by default ...
observable
.Where(x => x.Count > 0)
.Select(x => Observable.FromAsync(ct => StoreInternal(x.Last(), false, ct)))
.Concat()
.Subscribe(); // IDisposable discarded, no onError
return subject;
}
MongoCheckpointStore.cs#L32-L66
GetLastCheckpoint is called once per subscription run (EventSubscriptionWithCheckpoint.GetCheckpoint), so this happens on every resubscribe, not only at startup.
Found by reading the code while reviewing #603. None of it is reproduced with a failing test yet.
Consequences
1. One leaked pipeline per resubscribe. The old subject is dropped from the dictionary, but its pipeline is never completed and the IDisposable returned by Subscribe() is thrown away. With the default options (BatchSize = 1, BatchIntervalSec = 5) the pipeline is Buffer(TimeSpan, int), which runs on a timer, so each abandoned pipeline stays alive and wakes every 5 seconds for the rest of the process lifetime. A subscription that drops and recovers N times carries N orphaned timers.
2. Writes from the old and the new pipeline are not ordered against each other. Concat() serialises writes within one pipeline only. Whatever is still buffered or in flight on the old subject is written when its timer or queued write fires, which can be after the replacement run has stored a later position. The stored checkpoint then moves backwards until the next write. In production the window is narrow, because there is one replacement per resubscribe. It was much wider in the MongoDB projection tests, which polled GetLastCheckpoint every 100 ms against a live subscription until #603 changed them to read the collection directly.
3. _subjects is a plain Dictionary on a singleton. AddCheckpointStore<T>() registers the store as a singleton shared by every subscription in the container. GetLastCheckpoint writes the dictionary (L42) while other subscriptions' commit handlers read it in StoreCheckpoint (L75). One subscription resubscribing while another commits is an unsynchronised write and read.
Related, in the same pipeline
.Subscribe() has no error handler (L63). If StoreInternal throws, for example on a transient MongoDB failure, the sequence terminates and later OnNext calls on that subject go nowhere. Non-forced checkpoints then stop being persisted until the next resubscribe replaces the subject, or until shutdown force-writes the last position.
CheckpointCommitHandler cannot see this. StoreCheckpoint(force: false) returns as soon as OnNext does, so the handler records the position as committed and its UnableToCommitPosition log never fires.
Suggested direction
- Make
GetLastCheckpointa pure read. Create the subject lazily, once per checkpoint ID (ConcurrentDictionary.GetOrAddon the first non-forced store), so there is one pipeline per ID for the lifetime of the store. - Give each write its own error handling (catch, log, continue) so one failed write does not end the pipeline.
- Route forced writes through the same serialisation as batched ones, so a forced write cannot race a batched write that is still in flight.
- Implement
IAsyncDisposableon the store to complete the subjects and flush on shutdown.
Alternatively, consider dropping store-level batching. CheckpointCommitHandler already batches by CheckpointCommitBatchSize and CheckpointCommitDelayMs before it calls the store, so BatchSize and BatchIntervalSec batch a second time.
- 主要语言
- C#
- 星标
- 512
- 派生
- 99
- 平均合并
- 5 天 6 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 5
环境准备
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
Eventuous/eventuous 的其他 Issue
-
MongoDB integration tests fail on newer GitHub Actions runner kernels可能已有人在做 @nmummau 于 3 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
Eventuous/eventuous#626 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 7 天内回复
-
`dotnet format style --verify-no-changes` fails with naming violations and unnecessary imports可能已有人在做 @nmummau 于 3 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 80/100
Eventuous/eventuous#624 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 7 天内回复
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
Eventuous/eventuous#627 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 7 天内回复
-
SQL Server: `append_events` does not need the `@inserted` table variable可能已有人在做 @nmummau 于 9 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 20/100
Eventuous/eventuous#619 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 7 天内回复
-
SQL Server: stream reads do one key lookup per event, and `IDX_EventsStream` duplicates `UQ_StreamIdAndStreamPosition`可能已有人在做 @nmummau 于 9 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 18/100
Eventuous/eventuous#618 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 7 天内回复
查看 Eventuous/eventuous 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
Nimblesite/SharpLsp#468 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
elastic/ecs-dotnet#575 ·
-
alerts bug effort:S P2
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
nightscout/nocturne#2511 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
Crash in v3.00未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
arkane-systems/mousejiggler#140 ·