What EmbLinkRTOS needs from EmbCC (tracking)
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 25/100
调研方向
Start with the linked RTOS evidence, especially docs/engineering/hil-esp32-port-2026-11-05.md, docs/engineering/embcc-native-linux.md, and the named kernel paths. The checklist spans compiler builtins, host support, build integration, several architectures, and language conformance; first identify one item to split into its own issue, then verify its current status and define a focused completion criterion. The inventory alone does not specify a bounded change or test for the full tracking issue.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
This tracks what EmbLinkRTOS still needs from EmbCC. It is an inventory of the RTOS repository as of f76cc7c (2026-11-08). The RTOS's CI pins EmbCC 0.0.1-beta. Each item gives the evidence on the RTOS side and the workaround the RTOS uses today. Items can be split into their own issues when work starts.
RTOS links below are relative to https://github.com/EmbLinkOs/EmbLinkRTOS/blob/f76cc7c/.
1. Xtensa code speed
The only EmbCC runtime measurements are on the ESP32. The same kernel and port built by EmbCC take about 1.8 times GCC's cycles.
Checked build, 40 MHz, in cycles (docs/engineering/hil-esp32-port-2026-11-05.md):
| EmbCC | GCC | Clang | |
|---|---|---|---|
| notification hand-over | 2090 | 1163 | 1325 |
| semaphore hand-over | 2075 | 1154 | 1250 |
| semaphore give + take | 436 | 226 | 218 |
| interrupt wake | 4211 | 2500 | 2697 |
Release build, 160 MHz, against FreeRTOS on the same board (docs/engineering/bench-esp32-freertos-2026-11-06.md):
| FreeRTOS (GCC) | EmbLink GCC 16.1 | EmbLink Clang 22.1.4 | EmbLink EmbCC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
notify_handover |
1535 | 969 | 1135 | 1749 |
sem_handover |
1959 | 973 | 1056 | 1742 |
sem_give_take |
316 | 208 | 200 | 406 |
isr_wake |
3201 | 1951 | 2105 | 3247 |
Micro-costs under EmbCC: emb_thread_yield() with nothing to switch to costs 196 cycles; a software-interrupt round trip costs 318 (docs/ports/xtensa.md).
- Compare EmbCC's and GCC's code for the scheduler (
kernel/sched/sched.c) and the wait path (kernel/wait/wait.c), the hottest paths in these numbers.
2. Builtins the RTOS's compiler layer would use
include/emb/compiler/embcc.h defines none of the following, so the portable fallbacks in include/emb/compiler.h apply. If EmbCC already supports some of them, say which, and the RTOS will wire them in embcc.h (an RTOS change).
-
__builtin_clz,__builtin_ctz,__builtin_popcount. Without them, the scheduler's ready-set lookup (kernel/include/embk/word.h, called fromkernel/sched/sched.c) is a loop of up to 32 steps instead of one instruction. This may account for part of §1; it is not measured. -
__builtin_return_address(0). The crash record takes a software fault's pc from it (kernel/fault/fault.c), so under EmbCC that pc is 0. -
__builtin_constant_pand__builtin_unreachable. -
format(printf, …)checking,deprecated, and a C fallthrough attribute. Each is empty under EmbCC today.
3. Linux host compilation
EmbCC builds only the kernel on Linux. The RTOS's native port, board and tests are built by GCC, which also links: the "mixed" build of ADR-041 (docs/engineering/embcc-native-linux.md). That is the only EmbCC leg in the RTOS's CI.
- pthreads in the
x86_64-linux-gnuruntime. The error today isnative_port.c:20: error: cannot find include file "pthread.h". - Accept
__attribute__((__mode__)), so glibc's headers compile. glibc'ssys/types.h:164hastypedef int register_t __attribute__ ((__mode__ (__word__)));. - Ship a Linux
crt1.o. The 2026-10-14 snapshot failed withno crt1.o for x86_64-linux-gnu; check whether that is still the case.
4. Build-system integration
- CMake identification. CMake reports "The C compiler identification is unknown" and "Did not find file Compiler/-ASM", so it requests no dependency files. A stale 40 MHz tick configuration survived a rebuild because of it. The RTOS now forces
-MD -MT -MFitself (cmake/toolchains/embcc-depfile.cmake). An upstreamCompiler/EmbCC-*.cmakemodule, or a GCC-compatible identification, would fix this. - A dependency file for assembly sources. The RTOS adds
OBJECT_DEPENDSforxt_vectors.Sby hand (arch/xtensa/CMakeLists.txt).
5. Per architecture
Xtensa
- A release with
embld's Xtensa script support (D-024, #174). Until then, the ESP32 bring-up probe falls back to-Ttext/-Tdata. - A release with the working
embflash --esp(#173). The installed 0.0.1-beta build sent FLASH_END, the ROM answered error 0x06, and embflash exited 2. - Directives in Xtensa inline assembly. Only instructions are accepted, so
EMB_LAYOUT_MARKERuses a data form on__XTENSA__(ADR-054, A95). - Stop warning on unused
static inlinefunctions, as GCC and Clang do not. The RTOS marks three trace helpersEMB_UNUSEDfor it.
Together, the first two would let the RTOS add an EmbCC Xtensa CI leg.
AVR
-
.debug_frame: EmbDBG backtraces stop at frame 0. -
-gcode-size growth:-O0code may not fit the ATmega328P. - C++ on 16-bit targets ("the C++ lowering assumes a 32-bit int and 4-byte pointers").
There are no EmbCC size or speed numbers for AVR yet. Wiring __flash/progmem into the RTOS's flash macros and linking the conformance suite is a joint RTOS-side session (docs/ports/avr.md).
RISC-V
- Inline assembly:
lr/sc/amo*, thela/call/tailpseudo-instructions, and floating point. - The
interruptattribute. The RTOS uses an assembly trap entry.
Cortex-M
- CMSE with an FPU:
cmse_nonsecure_entryfunctions must clear the floating-point registers. - Armv6-M atomic helpers mask with PRIMASK, which has no effect in unprivileged Thread mode.
- Cortex-M23: checked only as an M33 with a Baseline instruction scan, never on an M23.
6. Language conformance and diagnostics
- Enforce
-std=(today accepted and ignored), so ISO conformance can be checked. - Refuse
_Thread_local/__threadon embedded targets, or implement it. Today each silently becomes one shared instance. -
__STDC_HOSTED__should be 0 under-ffreestanding; it is 1. - Complete
_Alignas, and_Atomicbeyond integer and pointer types. - The warnings the RTOS builds with:
-pedantic/-Wpedantic,-Wcast-align,-Wnull-dereference. Each is reported as "not a warning EmbCC has", 390 times across the RTOS's archived build logs. - Inline assembly: labels, wider-than-register outputs, callee-saved clobbers.
- Inlining of functions that return a struct. The RTOS's time constructors are macros for this reason (
include/emb/time.h, SPEC-001). The current toolchain profile no longer lists it, so it may be fixed; please confirm. - Build EmbCC warning-clean with GCC 14.2: a missing
readlinkdeclaration, then format-truncation and empty-body warnings.
Already done upstream
These need no work. The ten items of the RTOS's 2026-10-14 capability review are each done within their stated scope:
- Armv8-M stack limits;
- AVR linker scripts,
__flash/progmem, DWARF 4 and the EmbDBG register layout; - small RV32/AVR atomics;
- soft-float CMSE;
- Cortex-M23;
- SVD clusters/arrays/JSON;
- C++ without exceptions.
Constructor priorities, typedef alignment and 8-byte atomic helpers are also done.
The RTOS side still owes cleanup: some of its specifications describe these as missing, and its Xtensa default toolchain is EmbCC although its CI builds Xtensa only with GCC and Clang. That is being fixed there.
- 主要语言
- C
- 星标
- 1
- 派生
- 2
- 平均合并
- 20 小时 55 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 73
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
EmbLinkOs/EmbCC 的其他 Issue
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
documentation good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 50/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area: test kind: bug preview-effort: small priority: low
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
libsdl-org/SDL#16684 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
-
Issue-Bug Needs-Triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 2 天内回复