setconfig aborts lightningd (FATAL SIGNAL 6) when it cannot persist the change: "Could not write to config : No such file or directory"
维护者通常 2 天内回复
评估
调研方向
从 lightningd/configs.c 开始,跟踪 json_setconfig 经过 setconfig_success、configvar_save、create_setconfig_include 和 append_to_file 的调用流程。重现配置不可写的情况,并检查现有的 setconfig 或配置持久化测试。完成的标准是:持久化失败时返回 JSON-RPC 错误而不终止 lightningd,并且未被持久化的更改不会被报告为成功。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Issue and Steps to Reproduce
Calling setconfig on a node whose configuration file is not writable by the daemon crashes the entire node with FATAL SIGNAL 6 (abort), instead of returning a JSON-RPC error. The crash happens in the persistence step (setconfig_success → configvar_save → create_setconfig_include → append_to_file), i.e. after the command has been accepted.
Setup (a fairly standard hardened systemd deployment):
- lightningd v26.06.6 started as
lightningd --conf=/etc/lightning/lightning.conf /etc/lightning/lightning.confis owned by root; the service runs asUser=lightningwith systemd hardening, so/etcis read-only to the daemon:[Service] ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/lightningd --conf=/etc/lightning/lightning.conf User=lightning PrivateTmp=true ProtectSystem=full ProtectHome=read-only NoNewPrivileges=true PrivateDevices=true- Relevant config contents (sanitized):
network=bitcoin lightning-dir=/var/lib/lightning # writable by the daemon rpc-file=/var/lib/lightning-rpc/lightning-rpc rpc-file-mode=0660 - The option being set (
min-capacity-sat) was not previously set in any config file.
Steps:
lightning-cli setconfig min-capacity-sat 2000000
→ returns success to the client, butlistconfigs min-capacity-satstill shows10000/"source": "default", and nothing is persisted. (Silent no-op reported as success — arguably a second bug.)- Run the identical
setconfigagain
→lightning-cligetsreading response: socket closed; lightningd logs**BROKEN** lightningd: Could not write to config : No such file or directoryand aborts.
Note the error message contains an empty filename (to config :), which may point at the underlying cause — the include-file path apparently resolves to an empty string in this layout.
Expected behavior
- If persistence fails,
setconfigshould return a JSON-RPC error (and ideally roll back or keep the value as runtime-only with a warning) — a failedopen()/write()in an RPC handler should neverfatal()the daemon. - A
setconfigcall that changes and persists nothing should not report success.
Actual behavior
The node aborts mid-operation (ours was mid block-scan; systemd's Restart=on-failure brought it back, but on an unsupervised node this is an outage; on a node with active channels it is a crash during live operation, triggerable by any operator using a documented RPC).
Crash log / backtrace
Could not write to config : No such file or directory
2026-07-24T14:42:03.795Z **BROKEN** lightningd: Could not write to config : No such file or directory
lightningd: FATAL SIGNAL 6 (version v26.06.6)
0x600bab42c365 send_backtrace
common/daemon.c:38
0x600bab42c401 crashdump
common/daemon.c:83
0x783308695b2c ???
pthread_kill+0x11c:0
0x78330863c27d ???
gsignal+0x1d:0
0x78330861f8fe ???
abort+0xde:0
0x600bab3bc300 fatal_vfmt
lightningd/log.c:1128
0x600bab3bc39f fatal
lightningd/log.c:1138
0x600bab3ef823 append_to_file
lightningd/configs.c:351
0x600bab3ef99b create_setconfig_include
lightningd/configs.c:496
0x600bab3efc24 configvar_save
lightningd/configs.c:513
0x600bab3f02d8 setconfig_success
lightningd/configs.c:600
0x600bab3f086d json_setconfig
lightningd/configs.c:804
0x600bab3b3c13 command_exec
lightningd/jsonrpc.c:771
0x600bab3b59b1 rpc_command_hook_final
lightningd/jsonrpc.c:912
0x600bab3e6a7d hook_done
lightningd/plugin_hook.c:243
0x600bab3e6bae plugin_hook_call_next
lightningd/plugin_hook.c:343
0x600bab3e78c3 plugin_hook_call_
lightningd/plugin_hook.c:395
0x600bab3b607d plugin_hook_call_rpc_command
A full crash.log from the incident is available on request.
Environment
- Core Lightning v26.06.6 (built from source)
- Debian-based Linux inside a Proxmox LXC container, systemd-managed service
- bitcoind backend on the same host (was still catching up on blocks at the time; likely irrelevant)
Workaround
Avoid setconfig on deployments where the daemon cannot write its own config; edit the config file and restart instead. (Arguably a config file that the daemon cannot rewrite is a deliberate hardening choice, which is why graceful degradation would be valuable here.)
- 主要语言
- C
- 星标
- 3.1k
- 派生
- 1k
- 平均合并
- 3 天 10 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 40
环境准备
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
ElementsProject/lightning 的其他 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
ElementsProject/lightning#9593 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
ElementsProject/lightning#9322 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
ElementsProject/lightning#9206 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
ElementsProject/lightning#9187 · 1 条评论 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
QA
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
ElementsProject/lightning#9117 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
查看 ElementsProject/lightning 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
Status: Opened
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 75/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 90/100
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
Type: Bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
espressif/idf-extra-components#870 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复