Change Proposal: Align Button and IconButton with the design (sizes, radius)
维护者通常 3 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- react, typescript
调研方向
This is a design proposal; no implementation files or tests are named. Start by reading the Button and IconButton implementations and their stories, then compare their current sizing and radius with the stated Figma values. Done means both components use the specified 32/36/40px heights and matching radius, with stories, guidance, and changelog updated; first wait for maintainer review and acceptance.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
What is being proposed?
Bring Button and IconButton in line with the DiamondDS Figma design:
- Explicit, whole-pixel heights for
ButtonandIconButtonat eachsize, instead of sizes derived from MUI padding and line-height. - Square
IconButtonwith the same corner radius asButton(MUI default is round).
Text field sizing and an outlined IconButton are related but are out of scope here. Each will be proposed separately (see "Related, separate proposals").
Why is this needed?
-
Code and Figma disagree, and the code values are fractional:
Control Figma (S / M / L) sci-react-ui today (MUI) Button32 / 36 / 40 30.75 / 36.5 / 42.25 IconButton32 / 36 / 40 34 / 40 / 48 Fractional heights give blurry borders and misaligned rows.
IconButtonis up to 8px larger than the design at large. -
Small
Buttonand smallIconButtondo not line up in the same row (30.75 vs 34). -
A plain
IconButtonhas no border or fill until hover, so a standalone "+" next to a search field reads as decoration rather than as a control. -
A round
IconButtonnext to rectangular buttons, inputs and toggle buttons looks inconsistent.
What will change?
- Behaviour: none. Only appearance and dimensions change.
- Sizes:
ButtonandIconButtonget explicit heights (IconButtonis square: width = height), withbox-sizing: border-boxso outlined and contained variants stay the same height.Button: 32 / 36 / 40.IconButton: 32 / 36 / 40.
- Radius:
IconButtonuses the same radius asButton. - Stories, guidance and the changelog are updated.
Interface changes (if any)
None. No new props. The existing size values (small, medium, large) keep their names but map to the new dimensions.
<IconButton aria-label="New file" size="small"><Add /></IconButton> // now 32×32, square
No change to existing props. The existing size values (small, medium, large) keep their names but map to the new dimensions.
Breaking change?
- Yes
It is not an API break, but it is a visible change for apps already using these components:
IconButtonis smaller (small 34 → 32, medium 40 → 36, large 48 → 40) and square instead of round.Buttonchanges by about 1–2px (small 30.75 → 32, medium 36.5 → 36, large 42.25 → 40).- Apps that override
IconButtonsize or radius withsxshould check their overrides.
Mitigation: note it in the changelog and release notes, and tell teams with apps on the library before release so they can check their layouts.
Related, separate proposal: text field sizes
Not part of this change, but they affect it.
- Text field sizes: small (40) and medium (56) match Figma but not the 32 / 36 / 40 button scale, so a small field is 8px taller than a small
ButtonorIconButton. A separate proposal will cover smaller field sizes, the default size and floating labels in dense fields. Until then, a small field (40) pairs exactly with a largeButtonorIconButton(40). - Outlined
IconButton: a newvariant="outlined"so a standalone icon action (for example "new file" next to a search field) has a visible border at rest. It is not in Figma yet, so the design comes first.
Next steps
A maintainer will review this issue.
If accepted, it will be marked as accepted and a PR may then be opened.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 9
- 派生
- 4
- 平均合并
- 3 天 12 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 14
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
DiamondLightSource/sci-react-ui 的其他 Issue
-
accepted
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
DiamondLightSource/sci-react-ui#325 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
accepted
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
DiamondLightSource/sci-react-ui#283 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
accepted
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 25/100
DiamondLightSource/sci-react-ui#357 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
Spacing at the top of SidebarNav should be configurable可能已有人在做 @swara030 于 16 天前认领。 未关闭accepted
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 65/100
DiamondLightSource/sci-react-ui#334 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
needs-triage
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 38/100
DiamondLightSource/sci-react-ui#332 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
查看 DiamondLightSource/sci-react-ui 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
liberation-data/drivine#428 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
GitLab: a merge request closed without merging keeps the Git toolbar on View MR instead of Create MR未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent#11731 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 78/100