Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

fspy misses Bun file reads on Linux (glibc), so cached tasks replay stale output

未關閉
#777 2 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

@wan9chi 已經在處理了。

開始於 2026年9月30日。

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

描述

fspy

Note: This issue was written by an AI agent (Claude) on behalf of @chenxin-yan. The reproduction below was run and checked; the suspected cause is marked as unconfirmed.

On Linux with glibc, automatic input tracking does not see files that Bun reads. A cached task that runs bun then replays stale output after one of those files changes. The same read done by node is tracked correctly.

This is the Linux counterpart of #532. #542 fixed it for macOS only.

Reproduction

package.json:

{ "name": "vt-bun-repro", "private": true, "type": "module", "devDependencies": { "vite-plus": "1.0.0" } }

vite.config.ts:

import { defineConfig } from "vite-plus";

export default defineConfig({
  run: {
    tasks: {
      "read-node": `node -e "console.log(require('fs').readFileSync('data.txt', 'utf8'))"`,
      "read-bun": `bun -e "console.log(require('fs').readFileSync('data.txt', 'utf8'))"`,
    },
  },
});
echo v1 > data.txt
npm install
npx vp run read-node && npx vp run read-bun   # populate the cache
echo v2 > data.txt
npx vp run read-node
npx vp run read-bun

Output after the change:

$ node -e "..." ○ cache miss: 'data.txt' modified, executing
v2
$ bun -e "..." ◉ cache hit, replaying
v1

bun build behaves the same way: editing its entry file is not detected. We first saw this through crust build, which bundles with an embedded Bun. Edits to the CLI's TypeScript sources replayed a stale bundle, while reads done by Node were tracked. Listing the sources in cache.input works around it.

Environment

  • vite-plus 1.0.0 (also 1.0.0-rc.1)
  • Bun 1.4.2, and the Bun embedded in @crustjs/crust 0.5.0
  • Node 26.10.0 and 24.21.0
  • Linux 6.18 x86_64, glibc 2.42 (NixOS)

Suspected cause (unconfirmed)

According to crates/fspy/README.md, fspy on glibc Linux uses LD_PRELOAD for dynamically linked executables, and seccomp_unotify only for fully static binaries. Bun is dynamically linked against glibc (ldd lists libc.so.6), so only the preload path applies. Under strace, Bun's reads of the edited files appear as ordinary openat system calls. They seem to be issued directly rather than through the interposed libc functions. I have not confirmed this inside Bun's source.

Ask

Observe Bun's file accesses on Linux, for example through the seccomp path. Alternatively, fail closed or warn when a traced process's reads cannot be observed. Silently replaying stale output means a cached build or check can pass on changed inputs.

主要語言
Rust
星號
478
分支
48
平均合併
1 天 4 小時
30 天內合併 PR
64

環境準備

在 Codespaces 中開啟

在瀏覽器裡用你自己的 GitHub 帳號啟動這個專案的開發容器。

  • 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 沒有 Pull Request 範本
  • 閱讀貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

voidzero-dev/vite-task 的其他 Issue

查看 voidzero-dev/vite-task 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。