vp migrate rewrites catalog: specs in a Bun project whose workspaces.packages is empty

未關閉 適合新手
  • 哪裡不對？
#3,375 2 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
2/5
預估耗時
1-3 小時
新手友好度
76/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
bun, typescript
領域
build-system, cli

研究方向

從 packages/cli/src/migration/migrator/vite-plus-bootstrap.ts 中的 bunWorkspaceDeclaresPackages() 著手，檢查它如何處理根 workspaces 欄位的陣列和物件形式。使用 issue 中的 package.json 和 vp migrate 命令，透過 Bun 1.4.4 重現問題。當根 workspace 欄位包含空的 package 清單時，migration 保持 catalog 參照和 overrides 不變，即表示完成。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

migration pending triage triage: failed
Describe the bug

In a single-package Bun project that keeps its toolchain in workspaces.catalog with an empty workspaces.packages array, vp migrate handles the project as if it had no catalog support. It replaces every catalog: reference in devDependencies, and the catalog-valued entries in overrides, with concrete versions. workspaces.catalog stays in package.json, but nothing references it anymore.

Bun resolves this setup: bun install succeeds and vite resolves to @voidzero-dev/vite-plus-core. Bun only needs the root package.json to have a workspaces field; without one it fails with catalogs require a "workspaces" field in the root package.json. "workspaces": [] and "workspaces": { "packages": [] } both work.

The check that rejects this setup is bunWorkspaceDeclaresPackages() in packages/cli/src/migration/migrator/vite-plus-bootstrap.ts, which requires a non-empty package list. The comment above it says Bun resolves catalog: references only inside a workspace whose root package.json declares a non-empty workspaces. Bun 1.4.4 does not behave that way.

Reproduction

package.json:

{
  "name": "bun-root-catalog",
  "private": true,
  "type": "module",
  "packageManager": "[email protected]",
  "devDependencies": {
    "@vitest/coverage-v8": "catalog:",
    "vite": "catalog:",
    "vite-plus": "catalog:",
    "vitest": "catalog:"
  },
  "workspaces": {
    "packages": [],
    "catalog": {
      "@vitest/coverage-v8": "5.1.0",
      "vite": "npm:@voidzero-dev/[email protected]",
      "vite-plus": "1.5.0",
      "vitest": "5.1.0"
    }
  },
  "overrides": {
    "vite": "catalog:",
    "vitest": "catalog:"
  }
}

printf 'node_modules\n' > .gitignore
bun install
git init && git add -A && git commit -m init
vp migrate --no-interactive --no-hooks --no-agent --no-editor
git diff package.json

Actual: bun install succeeds before the migration. Afterwards devDependencies become "@vitest/coverage-v8": "5.1.0", "vite": "npm:@voidzero-dev/[email protected]", "vite-plus": "1.5.0" and "vitest": "5.1.0", and overrides become "vite": "npm:@voidzero-dev/[email protected]" and "vitest": "5.1.0". The catalog is left unused.

Expected: no changes. With only "packages": [] changed to "packages": ["packages/*"], and no packages directory at all, the same command prints This project is already using Vite+! Happy coding! and leaves package.json as it is.

Suggested fix

For Bun, treat any root workspaces field (array or object form) as catalog support, which matches the check Bun itself applies, instead of requiring a non-empty package list.

Environment
  • vite-plus 1.5.0 (global and local)
  • Bun 1.4.4
  • Node 26.13.0
  • macOS arm64

Related, but different: #1247 (object-form workspaces, fixed in #1250) and #2309 (vp up rewriting catalog: specs in a monorepo). I have not checked Bun versions older than 1.4.4.

主要語言
TypeScript
星號
6.6k
分支
303
平均合併
1 天 4 小時
30 天內合併 PR
224

環境準備

在 Codespaces 中開啟

在瀏覽器裡用你自己的 GitHub 帳號啟動這個專案的開發容器。

  • 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 沒有 Pull Request 範本
  • 閱讀貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

voidzero-dev/vite-plus 的其他 Issue

查看 voidzero-dev/vite-plus 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。