Blog post: "politics"
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
研究方向
此 issue 僅包含意識流式的筆記，而不是草稿或指定名稱的檔案。先檢查部落格目前的結構，然後在撰寫文章之前徵求 Steering Committee 的意見。完成的標準是在部落格上發布一篇經過仔細撰寫並獲得批准的文章。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
(Once the blog is up and running, and has gotten a reasonable amount of fun new technical content, we should deal with this particular elephant in the room. This isn't the post content, or even a lightly-edited draft, just some stream of consciousness thoughts. The full article will need a lot of careful drafting, and input from the Steering Committee as a whole.)
Substantial parts of the Scala community have become increasingly dismissive of "politics" in recent years. It's become hip to say "no politics", implicitly asserting that that is a good thing. It isn't.
"Politics" is a scary word, but what it means at heart is what people care about. Human beings don't always agree with each other; given any two people, they probably disagree about a lot. Politics is the art and science of dealing with those differences, and there is little that is more important.
Yes, some "politics" is just factional infighting, and that generally has little value -- the Typelevel Steering Committee very deliberately tries to stay out these sorts of playground fights, and we encourage our members to stay calm and not get into flame wars. We prefer not to engage with people who misrepresent us: there isn't much to be gained by feeding trolls or wrestling in the mud.
(Although please note: Typelevel is a collective, not a dictatorship, and we aren't in the business of either endorsing or refuting the private opinions of our members -- they speak for themselves.)
But much of what is casually dismissed as "politics" is deadly serious, and needs to be treated as such. The world is filled with evils, ranging from sexual abuse to a hundred forms of bigotry to the rise of authoritarianism. Standing against such things is not merely "politics" -- it's basic human decency.
So the next time you see someone poo-pooh "politics", it's worth asking: what do they mean by that? Do they actually mean to be that dismissive of the concerns of others? Do they actually believe that technology has no effect on a real world that is full of politics? Do they mean that it doesn't matter when those very real issues show up in the technical community itself? (Which is certainly no stranger to these sins.)
It's easy to be flippant, and pretend to be above "politics". But the right and just thing is to take those concerns seriously, even when they lead you into difficult waters. That's how you foster a community that is genuinely inclusive and welcoming.
- 主要語言
- HTML
- 星號
- 42
- 分支
- 114
- 平均合併
- 4 天 13 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 8
環境準備
- 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
- 沒有 Pull Request 範本
- 閱讀貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
typelevel/typelevel.github.com 的其他 Issue
-
難度 3/5 半天 新手友好度 68/100
typelevel/typelevel.github.com#688 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 48/100
typelevel/typelevel.github.com#610 · 4 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 42/100
typelevel/typelevel.github.com#602 · 4 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
Start Contributing Guide pages可能重新可做 @reardonj 於 63 天前認領，目前沒有進行中的 PR。 未關閉
typelevel/typelevel.github.com#590 · 3 則留言 · 2 個 reaction · 已指派 1 人 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 5/5 一週以上 新手友好度 35/100
typelevel/typelevel.github.com#589 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
查看 typelevel/typelevel.github.com 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
check:passed streams:add
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
curriculum documentation quality
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3897 ·
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
correction metadata
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 68/100
acl-org/acl-anthology#10103 · 1 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
resources
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
railmapgen/rmg-palette#2445 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆