Hacktoberfest 2026：維護者為十月標記出來的 issue，仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Type covariance absent when used in struct

未關閉
  • 哪裡不對？
#1,610 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
48/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
冷清
技術堆疊
rust
領域
data

研究方向

Start with the reported Test struct and the covariant and invariant function examples in this issue. Compare variance behavior for Array2 fields with Box, tuples, and Rust arrays; done means identifying and correcting the discrepancy and adding a regression test for the lifetime conversion.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

Arrays are covariant, but structs containing them don't seem to be. If I create a struct

struct Test<T> (ndarray::Array2<T>);

then, even though Array2 is covariant over T, my struct isn't:

// works
pub fn covariant<'long: 'short, 'short>(input: Box<ndarray::Array2<&'long u8>>) -> Box<ndarray::Array2<&'short u8>> {
    input
}

// compiler error
pub fn invariant<'long: 'short, 'short>(input: Box<Test<&'long u8>>) -> Box<Test<&'short u8>> {
    input
}

This doesn't make sense to me. From the rust reference, I would expect Test's variance to depend only on the types of its field, but it doesn't. Moreover, only structs that internally contain Array2 are affected: structs that take the array as a parameter (like the Box above) are fine, as are tuples and rust arrays. This is also unaffected by the complexity of the type inside the array, as long as it references a lifetime.

主要語言
Rust
星號
4.3k
分支
391
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

環境準備

這個專案沒有提供開發容器、Dockerfile 或貢獻指南，環境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步驟見我們的新手貢獻指南。

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

rust-ndarray/ndarray 的其他 Issue

查看 rust-ndarray/ndarray 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。