Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

[spec] clarification or change of "`partial\n` in a `py.typed` file"

未關閉
#2,113 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 類型
文件
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
停滯
技術堆疊
python
領域
documentation

研究方向

先閱讀 distributing.html 中關於部分 stub 套件的章節,接著比較連結的 mypy、pyright 和 ty 檢查,以及所參照的 discuss.python.org 討論串。完成的標準是就預期的比對規則達成共識,並更新規格以明確且無歧義地說明該規則,包括換行字元和檔案結尾的行為。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

topic: typing spec

Reading through https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/distributing.html#partial-stub-packages today for unrelated purposes, it struck me that the occurrences of partial\n are ambiguous because it could be interpreted as requiring literally a backslash and an n. Furthermore, assuming \n is actually not to be taken literally (which is reasonable given that other places in the spec use glob stars anyway, although never in something you actually type into a file) it's ambiguous what happens if you use CRLF or CR as line terminators in your file. This also seems to rule out a file that just contains partial and then ends, without a newline character (you're not "supposed to" do this, but it happens).

To keep exactly the current behavior, I think this verbiage should be tweaked to "partial, followed by a newline". Perhaps the linefeed and carriage return characters could be mentioned explicitly, or a mention can be made of universal newlines.

However, I am not sure if the current behavior is actually important to specify, and I think other possibilities make more sense. Other possibilities include "partial on a line by itself", "partial surrounded by any amount of whitespace", and just "partial". "As the sole content of the file" may be added if desired.

A brief survey suggests that:

  • mypy does fscache.read(stub_typed_file).decode().strip() == "partial", which is not quite the same as the specified check
  • pyright does (pyTypedContents.match(/partial\n/) || pyTypedContents.match(/partial\r\n/)), which is certainly a reasonable interpretation of the current spec, especially if you assume that no one ever uses only-CR newlines
  • ty does to_ascii_lowercase().contains("partial") to be deliberately permissive, as explained in a comment

There is a reasonably long discussion about this topic over at https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-561-clarification-regarding-n/32875, but I didn't find it very enlightening.

主要語言
Python
星號
1.8k
分支
302
平均合併
4 小時 16 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
7

環境準備

這個專案沒有提供開發容器、Dockerfile 或貢獻指南,環境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步驟見我們的新手貢獻指南。

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

python/typing 的其他 Issue

查看 python/typing 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。