Support for `ParamSpec` for `type`

未關閉
#1,991 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
30/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
需要釐清
活躍度
停滯
技術堆疊
python
領域
tooling

研究方向

檢視範例中描述的 ParamSpec 對 typeCallable 的行為,然後將其與 typing issue #1966 中的可能方向進行比較。完成這項工作需要達成一種共識表示方式,該表示方式能保留建構函式參數資訊,並使提議的多載可區分,但此 issue 沒有指明實作檔案或測試。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

topic: feature

The problem I'm having is that the type doesn't support ParamSpec, so I can't use that to enforce args and kwargs, in the same way as as Callable. I'm not 100% sure whether this is correct, but isn't every type a Callable, so in a sense that type is a subtype of Callable, so there should be a way to represent type in the same way as a Callable to obey Liskov?

For example, I'm trying to write an overload such that passing in a type will return ExpectType, while a general Callable returns ExpectCallable:

from collections.abc import Callable

import typing_extensions as t

P = t.ParamSpec("P")
T_co = t.TypeVar("T_co", covariant=True)

class ExpectCallable(t.Generic[P, T_co]): ...
class ExpectType(ExpectCallable[P, T_co]): ...

@t.overload
def expect(
    v: type[T_co], /, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs
) -> ExpectType[P, T_co]: ...
@t.overload
def expect(
    v: Callable[P, T_co], /, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs
) -> ExpectCallable[P, T_co]: ...
def expect(
    v: type[T_co] | Callable[P, T_co], /, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs
) -> ExpectType[P, T_co] | ExpectCallable[P, T_co]:
    return ExpectType() if isinstance(v, type) else ExpectCallable()

class A:
    def __init__(self, inp: str, /) -> None: ...

def fn(inp: str, /) -> None: ...

t.assert_type(expect(A), ExpectType[[], A])  # Shouldn't be allowed  
t.assert_type(expect(fn, "inp"), ExpectCallable[[str], None])

As you can see that t.assert_type(expect(A), ExpectType[[], A]) passes with no errors, even though A is suppose to take in a str argument. I'm expecting expect(A) to require a str argument, similar to how expect(fn, "inp") requires the second parameter "inp".

Note that I haven't used *args and **kwargs in the example for simplicity, but they are meant to be used inside of the Expect classes.

Maybe the simplest way is to add a new class TypeCallable that allows for TypeCallable[P, T] instead of modifying type, so the above example is achievable:

@t.overload
def expect(
    v: TypeCallable[P, T_co], /, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs
) -> ExpectType[P, T_co]: ...
@t.overload
def expect(
    v: Callable[P, T_co], /, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs
) -> ExpectCallable[P, T_co]: ...
def expect(
    v: TypeCallable[P, T_co] | Callable[P, T_co], /, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs
) -> ExpectType[P, T_co] | ExpectCallable[P, T_co]:
    return ExpectType() if isinstance(v, type) else ExpectCallable()

Note that I think https://github.com/python/typing/issues/1966 might also solve the above problem.

主要語言
Python
星號
1.8k
分支
302
平均合併
23 小時
30 天內合併 PR
8

貢獻指南

這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

python/typing 的其他 Issue

查看 python/typing 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。